Book Jacket

 

rank  Editors Pick
word count 39981
date submitted 23.08.2008
date updated 03.10.2008
genres: Fiction, Comedy
classification: moderate
incomplete

Scratch

Danny Gillan

The un-sanitised, hilarious and emotionally honest story about one man's quest to start his adult life again from Scratch.

Scratch is complete at 98k words.

 

Jim Cooper, a 33 year-old Glaswegian call centre worker, makes a big decision. He’s going back to adulthood ground-zero - no job, no debt, no, er, home, and starting again. Maybe this time he can do it right and get (or, rather, keep) the girl.
Given that his forward planning skills don’t extend beyond praying and having panic attacks, it isn’t surprising when Jim soon finds himself living with his parents and working for minimum wage, in the same pub he worked in when he was 18. Paula Fraser walking through that pub’s door for the first time in 12 years though, that is unexpected.
What’s even more surprising is that Paula admits she still loves Jim. But she’s married, and doesn’t want to be ‘a bitch’ until she’s told her husband the marriage is over. Unfortunately her husband is caring for his sick, possibly dying, beloved grandfather, and Paula can’t bring herself to have ‘the conversation’ until the old man gets better, or fatally worse.
And so, Jim and Paula embark on the tricky business of not having an affair, and not telling anyone they know that they’re not having an affair. Shouldn't be a problem, surely?

 
rate the book

to rate this book please Register or Login

 

tags

commercial, contemporary, funny, humour, scottish

on 93 watchlists

212 comments

 

To leave comments on this or any book please Register or Login

subscribe to comments for this book
HarperCollins Wrote

I’d been wanting to read this ever since I saw the line ‘She was by far the most attractive person I had ever punched’ in one of the comments it received. And I wasn’t disappointed – there is some very funny stuff in here, including some fantastic bits of dialogue and some wonderful supporting characters. Paula’s father is brilliantly bonkers on first meeting and Terry is instantly likeable. All in all, a very strong cast of character and a lovely idea for a comic novel: a second shot at love – and life – with the girl who got away.

This strikes me as a book aimed fairly squarely at a Nick Hornby-ish readership: the hapless male protagonist, the wry tone, and the romance at the heart of it will all appeal to a similar demographic to books like High Fidelity and Fever Pitch. The humour is nicely handled, though there are places were I felt the jokes could be slightly more sophisticated and where the tone was a bit too sophomoric for my taste. When Jim vomits on his computer, for example – this is gross-out humour, which can be used to great effect, but which I would save for a more genuinely climactic moment, once the reader has had a bit more of a chance to come to know and sympathise with Jim. It’s one thing to have a hapless protagonist – it’s another to have a protagonist whose flaws are so visceral that the character becomes off-putting. There are places, too, where I felt the voice was that of the author rather than the protagonist (lines like ‘I still have no idea what that was about’, which I didn’t think worked hard enough to demonstrate Jim’s character).

I’d think very carefully about who this book is aimed at. Commercial, comic fiction is a very tough marketplace – few books survive in it, and those that do need to be very sleekly and clearly packaged. Are you expecting men to read this, or women? Is it a love story or a book primarily about male relationships and obsessions? The clearer you can be about who you are targeting, the better.

There is definite potential here, if you can tighten up your language (be ruthless in cutting phrases that don’t add anything to character or plot and watch out for places where the tone slips into more adolescent humour), be mindful of your pacing/suspense and comic beats, and elaborate a little on your existing characterisation. Paula, for example, is only very quickly sketched out in your opening chapter. I think she needs some rounding out in order to be believable as the object of a life-long love.

Our fiction list at HarperPress tends to focus on slightly more literary fiction with a more female readership, so I'm not sure the tone of this is currently right for us. However I'd think this could (with a fair bit of polishing) sit comfortably on a commercial fiction list.

30/10/08

halo wrote 1251 days ago

hi
I have to admit a vested interest in "Scratch ",or ,more precisely ,the author.

Having been his father throughout his lifetime I can vouch that Danny's standards in all that he does are of the highest calibre .

His writing maintains those standards and it is no surprise to all the family that he has reached number 1
in your readers list . There is probably a lot more to come from the pen of Glasgow's next quality author.

Thank you for giving us the opportunity to see his name in such excellent company .

Diane wrote 1259 days ago

Chapter One:

"She was by far the most attractive person I had ever punched."

Hilarious!

By gawd though, this is darkly humorous and I love it. Though I've written some first person, I don't usually like reading it, but this is spot on -- the pace is excellent, the narrative beats perfect. This is craft. Kudos. Don't change a word.

I will read on when I've whittled down my watchlist.

Thanks for sharing this.

Pam Eaves wrote 1262 days ago

Love it. Fairly races along. It should find a home easily.

Pam Eaves

kwasumang wrote 1261 days ago

brilliant opening... captivating, a real hook. i need to say this before i finish the first chapter.
kweku

Burgio wrote 569 days ago

SCRATCH
I was browsing through past gold star books (the forum says books on this site used to be better than they are now) and stopped to open SCRATCH. It has an overall gentle tone about it that announces it will be a fun read. You have good characters in both Paula and Jim. They make good contrasts to each other. Makes it a good read. I’m adding it to my shelf. Burgio (Grain of Salt)

themarcthomas wrote 1047 days ago

You know what mate? I imagine Ewan McGregor reading the first paragraph in the same way that he did in Trainspotting.

That's a good sign - as long as you like Ewan McGregor that is!

Marc

tjlang wrote 1059 days ago

Absolutely love it...I can't wait to read the rest. On my shelf for sure!

Jason Rice wrote 1086 days ago

Seems like I'm just a voice in the storm here, I like your tone and writing, it's smooth and loose, seems to be less about writing and more like a conversation, very good.

Hughew wrote 1140 days ago

Okay, back again. I just finished reading some of the comments your readers from "across the pond" have made. I had no difficulty understanding the colloquialisms. I know what "knackered" means.. as well as what a "wanker" is. I've read all of James Herriots books, in which he uses an occasional colloquialism, so I've developed an understanding for such.

I come from across the pond from those that are across the pond from you.... the middle of the Pacific Ocean. So if I can figure out what you are talking about, I'm sure others can as well.

Your sense of humor is fantastic. I can't wait for more of your work to appear.

Hughe

Hughew wrote 1140 days ago

What a scream!! Even just the story description got me rolling on the floor. You have a sure winner here Danny!!

Ohhh, and anyone whose dad thinks well enough of his writing abilities, and is willing to take the time out to comment on his work is alright in my book ( no pun intended).

I wish you great success with this one.

Hughe

Richard P-S wrote 1195 days ago

Danny, you're a gent, and very kind. R

Richard P-S wrote 1195 days ago

Danny, can't remember if you'd had a look at BB yet. Would be great if you could. Any advice gratefully received. R

George Flaunden wrote 1204 days ago

Really good stuff, I wouldn't be unhappy if I'd paid good money to read this.
George Flaunden

4dprefect wrote 1207 days ago

Hey, cheers, Danny. Long time no hear. Hope things are going well for you. I'm so chuffed with the response to Evil here, just hope HC feel the same way :) Thanks and hopefully you'll be around for the end of month celebrations... ;) Simon

Sean Cassidy wrote 1213 days ago

Greetings Danny!
I understand that if you remove your chapters in order to reorganise them your book falls off all the bookshelves that it was on! It’s really infuriating and I think it happened to me yesterday. There was certainly a glitch.

I wonder if you could put Lust Orders! back on your shelf if indeed it was there yesterday. Many thanks indeed.

Best,
Sean

JAMBAKWAL wrote 1215 days ago

Hi Danny

Thanks for the email address. I WILL be in touch (jbwalsh61@hotmail.com)

Good luck with yours (I'll buy it, for sure!) cheers mate

James

RedAdept wrote 1216 days ago

I'm sorry. I am very new to this site. I didn't realize how the comments section worked, about commenting on other people's sites. As you can see by mine, I just started getting comments today. :-)

No, I didn't think you were 'getting back at me'. LOL I actually like your story line.

I just wanted your readers to know that I was wrong in my critique. I was afraid they wouldn't see your response.

Oh, and I have no idea how to delete a comment. Yes, I am VERY new.

RedAdept wrote 1216 days ago

By the way, you probably should have commented on my comment under this book thread so that your current and future readers will see that you 'corrected my correction'.

Putting your comment, which has nothing to do with my book, on MY book thread means that it may not get read by YOUR readers.

Just an observation.

RedAdept wrote 1216 days ago

I will concede the "till" debate.

Here, my english teachers always told me that using 'till' for 'until' was unacceptable. However, there are major differences in our languages, even though we both speak English. So, as you say, it is acceptable there. My apologies for trying to correct something that I obviously knew nothing about.

Thank you for clarifying 'wanker'. :-)

RedAdept wrote 1216 days ago

I'm sorry, but I will be stopping at chapter 1. It was a pretty decent read, but I am American and had trouble picking the story from come of the colloquialisms. What does knackered mean? I think it means 'tired', but I wasn't positive.

You made one mistake that I see quite often in unpublished works: He said he usually doesn't try to 'cop a feel' (changed for an American phrase :-) ) "till" he knows someone better. The word "till" should be either "until" or "[apostrophe] til'

Anyway, from all of your great comments, I am sure you have a great book going here. And, since your goal is obviously a British audience, I hope you won't be offended my my not finishing.

And, what's a "wanker"? For some reason, I had always thought that was an insult, I guess because it sounds dirty to an American. But, she doesn't seem to be using it to insult, is she?

Adrian Haiselden wrote 1216 days ago

PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE ACTUAL PLACES THAT APPEAR IN 'DARK DEEDS & ALCHEMY' CAN BE VIEWED ON FLICKR.COM AT: http://www.flickr.com/search/?ss=2&ct=6&w=18272233%40N00&q=daniel+trance&m=text

Sean Cassidy wrote 1221 days ago

Hi Danny, it's Sean Cassidy here. How did the review of the editors go? What did they have to say?

Best,
Sean

Galanl wrote 1221 days ago

Beautifully crafted, tender but brutally realistic. I loved it. And it achieved, for me, the ultimate distinction, of leaving me feeling slightly cheated that I didn't know what happened next to these characters - these people - of whom I had grown so fond.

Galanl wrote 1221 days ago

Beautifully crafted, tender but brutally realistic. I loved it. And it achieved, for me, the ultimate distinction, of leaving me feeling slightly cheated that I didn't know what happened next to these characters - these people - of whom I had grown so fond.

Flowerpot wrote 1221 days ago

Really racy writing - but for me the descripton of Mooshead slowed down the narrative. I wanted to know more about what was going to happen, not hear about beer! But that's very minor point. Will read more later - thanks.

Ali Cooper wrote 1221 days ago

I've only read the first few pages of this but I like the voice - it's pretty consistent and feels just like a male friend is chatting to me. Very believable and easy to read.

danny wrote 1222 days ago

stef nalton, you don't have a book up yet so I'll post my thanks for your comments here in the hope you see them. I've certainly spent a lot of time editing Scratch, both by myself and with the help of writers from other critique sites. I'm glad you enjoyed it. Thanks again, Danny.

Sylvia wrote 1222 days ago

Danny, I realised this is the only top 5 I've not commented on, so I read a chapter, then another, then ... well ... I stopped at the end of four simply because of the time. I've said before that I'm not a laugh-out-loud person and didn't manage a guffaw until C4 - 'You're a wanker, Jim' - though I smiled and grinned a lot, and found it a thoroughly entertaining read. Likable and suitably flawed main characters, a great sense of humour, and accomplished writing. I wish you the very best, and well done with your other novel.

JAMBAKWAL wrote 1222 days ago

Danny

Thanks a lot mate, that's brilliant. I was obviously still tinkering with it when you had a look, coz I'd already made a couple of slight changes to the version that you edited for me; but I was still unhappy with it even though I knew it was much better than what I had before; but I'm really happy with your suggestions. Is it ok if I use it exactly as you've suggested?

James

JAMBAKWAL wrote 1222 days ago

Hi Danny

I know you're up to your eyeballs with exciting stuff right now, but I just changed my long pitch and I wondered if you'd give it a glance when you can. Thanks, James

Steve Austin wrote 1223 days ago

Let us all know what the editors say, won't you? lol

Ken Hyder wrote 1224 days ago

Hi Danny,

You knew it was coming, so no surprise.

But congratulations nonetheless.

I hope it turns into real exposure on real bookshelves and that it makes it easier to continue the work.

So gie it ladly.

All the best,

Ken

4dprefect wrote 1224 days ago

Congrats on your gold star, Danny. Well-deserved.

David Bradley wrote 1224 days ago

Danny, thanks, good to know I'm reading this right. The protocol was a bit confusing initially ( for me, at least. )

Richard P-S wrote 1224 days ago

Good. Thanks. Time for bed. Got a job to think about. R

Richard P-S wrote 1224 days ago

Dear Danny, thanks for that. Didn't send you a note so you'd feel obliged, but to genuinely wish you luck. I could do with you backing BB, though, but only if you genuinely like it. R

David Bradley wrote 1224 days ago

I'm new, but I think the yellow star means you've made it. Congratulations, I'm not so new that I can't appreciate your achievement here.

Richard P-S wrote 1224 days ago

Dear Danny, haven't read Scratch because, to be honest, I thought it was a dead cert because it's been at number 1 since the day I joined. I wish you luck with it, and with your other, shortly to be published book. R

JOSEPH CANNING wrote 1225 days ago

I like the snappy-style. Like the good, old-fashioned cynicism of the narrator, too -- a going-nowhere (your word!). Good opening, good pace, good dialogue. It reads well, no 'blockages' to jump over, so to speak. 'Four yeses,' as Simon Cowell would say. -- Joe Canning.

Tami Su wrote 1225 days ago

Great, easy-flow read. Funny. I like the balance of Scottish phrases - not too much that it confuses Americans like me, but enough to keep it authentic. Are you going to post the remainder of the book? I'd love to read more.
Tami Su

Michael2402 wrote 1226 days ago

Great first chapter, I love the main character, he seems to have a great balance of intelligence and idiocy at the same time which makes him incredibly endearing. I've added you to my bookshelf - not that you need it with so little time left of the month - but you deserve it and I hope something comes of it for you.

Hannah wrote 1226 days ago

You've got a great book here and I've been really enjoying reading it over the past few nights. I hope you do well when you land on the editor's desk.
Hannah

Dora McAlpin wrote 1226 days ago

This is an excellent read.

First-person narrative, when done well, can make for a truly engaging experience. I love how you do it.

Jim is immedately likable. The humor throughout gives it all the fun of an Easter egg hunt.

You're dealing with topics of life truth here and handling it masterfully. There's a little bit of Jim in all of us.

4dprefect wrote 1227 days ago

You've like 190 comments on this already. What can I possibly add except a spot of maths. 81 bookshelves. That's 81 out of - let's say, for the sake of argument - 1000 members who would buy this book. Maybe the public out in the real world aren't quite so discerning, so let's say only half out there would buy this. That's 40 out of every thousand. That's 40000 copies for every million book buyers. I hope that when this lands on the HC editor's desk, as it surely will, their sums, although in all likelihood more accurate than mine, will reach the same conclusion as I did after reading only the opening few chapters of this. Terrific stuff.

fearnJohn wrote 1227 days ago

Hi Dan
Well, you seem to be holding your own laddie!! (could not resist that! ;). Being a huge fan of trainspotting and having read your first chapter. You got me hooked straight away with Paula Fraser. Love her character pal. 'Jim Cooper, you are by far the biggest wanker I've ever met' It has humour and is written to perfection(In my eyes anyway) Good luck, not long to go!! Laddie!!!

JAMBAKWAL wrote 1227 days ago

Thanks Danny; that's all mate, just, honestly, thanks. Sorry to have taken up so much of your time. James

JAMBAKWAL wrote 1227 days ago

Thanks Danny, for both taking the time and your kind comments. I'm finding it so difficult to make much time for reading (as, clearly, you are too) and, added to that, I really do need to change my long pitch (it just sucks), although I think the comment I received about it, just before yours, was a bit OTT. I noticed that you recently had a really negative comment, how do you deal with that? why do people even make comments like that? I've had interest from an agent who wants to see the whole thing but, you know what, I sometimes think I'm too fragile to put myself through it. It's a bit like when you buy a lottery ticket; you really just want to feel like you belong, you don't seriously think that you could win! Sorry, I'm ranting (days lose their meaning sometimes). Fuck 'em! James

JAMBAKWAL wrote 1228 days ago

Hi Danny

I'm sorry it's taken me so long to get around to reading some of your work. Ironically, it's probably because it's doing so well that I keep putting it (in terms of my reading) below books that, perhaps, need the comments and feedback more than you do; I hope you understand what I mean by that. Anyway, you don't need me to tell you how good it is and I've enjoyed what I've read greatly and if there's any justice then I'll end up having to buy it in order to finish reading it; I do hope so. Good luck mate. James

Sean Cassidy wrote 1228 days ago

Hi Danny, good to know you're holding your position at the top. I hope Glasgow's enjoying the weather that we're having on the south coast today - beautiful.

Best,
Sean Cassidy
Lust Orders!

alezrander3 wrote 1228 days ago

sorry to burst ur bubble but this book is not funny. There nothing that stands out in this book

sorry

Annie wrote 1229 days ago

Danny, I've come by to say congratulations on a fabulous innings. Now that your book is solidly on the editor's desk to be read in a few days, I will be taking it off my bookshelf.

This is certainly NOT because I want to stop backing it... Oh no... it's only because I want to make some room for the next batch of books I'll be backing for next month's reading.

I wish you all the best with this, and hope that you get a publishing contract out of it.

Great work!

best
anne

AJK wrote 1229 days ago

Finally got round to the number one spot! shame on me and sorry.
You have a great knowledge of pubs Danny. I am a publican and you were spot on!! you forgot to mention cleaning the dirty ashtrays!! Mind you since the smoking ban they just chuck then in the street! easy for us!
This was original and really well written. You clearly took a long time planning it and it works.
Its witty,perfect for thirtysomethings..even younger! pace was good and well written dialogue. I see the results from the last top 5 are in so I wish you so much luck here. maybe it was a good thing not to be in the first bunch....

2004carlt wrote 1230 days ago

Danny, If you like the look of that software you can contact me offline using the email address I have on my page. Good luck.

2004carlt wrote 1230 days ago

http://www.stylewriter-usa.com/