Book Jacket

 

rank 1348
word count 116098
date submitted 12.04.2010
date updated 20.05.2012
genres: Fiction, Thriller, Crime
classification: universal
complete

Dead Reckoning

Philip John

It's for the country. We have no choice. You are our man, Charles. You know how these things are done.

 

Wealthy businessman Charles du Randt is persuaded by friends in high places to rid the country of a number of troublesome individuals, who are seemingly beyond the law. To carry out the task he recruits a former soldier, Marc Dampier, who must first 'disappear' himself, to ensure absolute secrecy. One by one the targeted individuals meet untimely deaths, apparently from heart attacks. Only one person, a friend of Marc Dampier, suspects that something untoward is going on but her efforts to get at the truth are blocked at every turn. This is hardly surprising, given who was behind the original conspiracy.

None of this could possibly happen, you tell yourself. Not in a country like ours. Not with people like this. But as the story takes a totally unexpected turn, you think again. Is it really so impossible?

"A true thriller."

"A rattling yarn."

"Right out of an action thriller movie."

"One of the best things I've read for a long time."

 
rate the book

to rate this book please Register or Login

 

tags

action, betrayal, crime, death, fiction, politics, thriller

on 19 watchlists

98 comments

 

To leave comments on this or any book please Register or Login

subscribe to comments for this book
Robert Lawrence wrote 4 days ago

Hi Phil,
I was looking forward to rereading your book but nothing seemed to have moved on in respect of improving puctuation, sentence structure etc., which is a great shame. The premise of the story really is great and it is a shame its telling is marred by technicalities. I would really encourage you to iron these out so that the story can come to the fore.
Rob Lawrence. 'To Set a Mouse Running'

Kenneth Edward Lim wrote 4 days ago

Philip,
What a premise to work on, a millionaire drawn to the lure of action reminiscent of old army days.. He gets friends together as part of his scheme, all his preparations making for captivating read. Your narrative comes in a successiuon of detailed paragraphs full of backstory needed to add impetus toi the action. Your dialoge is energetic and concise. Thanbk you so much for the delightful read.

Kenneth Edward Lim
The North Korean.

M.T.H wrote 5 days ago

Just finished Chapter One. This is a very polished piece of work, you have clearly been working on it for a long time.
I'll continue to read more as I'm interested in where you're taking us.

Malcolm

Dianna Lanser wrote 7 days ago

Hi Philip,

I love a fast-paced, Bourne Supremacy type story and I got that sense right at the very beginning with the ditch ‘em scenario and with the telephone box scene. You did well to start your story with some action.

I also liked that you “showed” Charles du Randt’s character and I loved reading about his wealth and his exclusive set of friends. The premise of this group’s purpose is clearly understood. In fact, as I read, I felt it was a little drawn out. By the end of chapter one I was more than ready for some edge-of-the-seat action.

But that doesn’t mean that you do not have a wonderful way with words. No. You are a very talented writer - able to clearly create an imaginable scene and evoke emotion and interest within your reader. Your characters are well-defined and understood. Perhaps it was the knowledge of your ability that I wanted to get into the deed of rescuing the English society more quickly.

Chapter two adds some interest and by chapter three I’m hooked with acquisition of Marc Dampier. Good job. I know I only read the tip of the ice berg, but none-the-less, I’m impressed that you have completed your novel. That in itself speaks of tenacity and giftedness. Six stars!

Dianna Lanser
Nothing But The Blood

I hope you don’t mind me pointing out a couple easy fixes I found in chapter one.

You do a little head hopping in the telephone box scene. First in the driver’s thoughts and then in Mr. Charles‘

“Aim not just (at) the man in the street, who knew only too well…”

Camac wrote 26 days ago

Hi Philip,

I write as someone who reads Crime and Thriller novels for pleasure. I've read guidebooks on how to write for these genres. My comments are based on a read of your first three chapters.

I think you have put a lot of work into the opening chapters and you have the bones of an excellent thriller. One of the first questions those who judge fiction (agents and editors) ask themselves is whether the story starts in the right place. With thrillers you have to hit the ground running and for me your story starts at Chapter 3 at the courthouse. (Others may disagree, of course). I believe we see too much of du Randt early on, learn too much about a wealthy man's lifestyle and servant. This slows the forward momentum, and can go in later as backstory. Conflict gets the reader's interest and it is lacking in these chapters. Why not have du Randt and Marc disagree strongly over something (conflict) so that there is doubt in the readers mind and they want to read on to see how it is resolved. Similarly with the gang of four: I would have one disagree with the others (conflict) and want to withdraw from the group. But he knows too much ... and so he becomes the killer's first victim. And it's important to show serious differences - not just mention them in passing.

I hope something here will be of use to you. I plan to return to read more.

Camac Johnson
Untouchable

Jehmka wrote 30 days ago

I’m slow at reviews, slow at picking out problems with structure. I’m quick however when it comes to nitpicking details. So, that’s what I’m doing here… nitpicking.

The opening scene (losing the trailing car) reads every bit like a prologue. But I like that you didn’t call it that. I think a lot of readers (myself included) are put off immediately by the word ‘prologue.’ Better to sneak it in in the guise of the chapter opening, as you’ve done.

Now some nitpicking…
“Any other day(comma - no and) he would probably…”
“He made a point of lunching…” This paragraph contains a lot of short phrases (fragments) that could be combined into real sentences. This may be intentional, but it will have some readers stopping and taking note of it. If you intend this as a point of style, I think (my big fat-headed opinion, in other words) it’s better to work it in more gradually – let the reader first get caught up in the story.
“…if his business (was) to flourish(comma) as it invariably did.”
“Work over, he then relaxed (em-dash) usually in the comfort…” The em-dash – is a great tool for joining loose, related fragments to a sentence when a comma doesn’t quite cut it. “Usually in the comfort of his own home.” just plain does not hold up on its own.

“One ex(hyphen)wife, who collected her (alimony, I think, is the actual legal term) and gave him no trouble.”

“At forty(hyphen)eight(comma) Charles was fit…”

“No(no hyphen here) one knew just how rich…”

See what I mean? I’m a nitpicker above all else… and proud of it.  Useful or not (perhaps annoying), my intention is to be helpful.

Good luck with Dead Reckoning.

Robert Lawrence wrote 35 days ago

Phil,
I believe in honest crits; not fluffy one designed to get reciprical platitudes. The story is good and I enjoyed it. I think there are problems with things like sentence structure, punctuation which mar the flow of the story. In one or two instances the odd word seemed to jar.
I think the story is strong enough and good enough to deserve these purely technical wrinkles to be ironed out.
As I said, a good read; well done. And apologies for the delay in getting the read done.

Karamak wrote 37 days ago

You have nailed it ! Excellent read
Karamak Faking it in France

philip john wrote 54 days ago

Dear Fran,

Very many thanks for these comments, which are very helpful. I take your criticisms very much to heart. I tried to bring out, amongst other things, some of the contradictions and hypocrisy which go to make up modern political life but might not have got it quite right. As well as writing a common or garden thriller along the way, of course. Thank you anyway for giving the book a try.

Best wishes

Philip

Dear Philip

As I have been reading this, I have been hardly aware that it was uploaded here. Feels like a book. Not my usual read. But I am thoroughly enjoying it. Four chapters in, I am interested in what is happening and looking forward to more. I like the set up: the characters feel real and very well portrayed. The scenes are well drawn and the pace is good. There are enough questions in my mind, so that I am happy to keep reading.

The action and dialogue feel much tighter and more convincing than the theorising. The fourth section of chapter 1, where the old boy net is discussing law and order, feels a bit heavy and there seems to be a central contradiction. If the Chief Justice so keen on "soft" option like community service, why does there also seem to be a policy of exemplary sentencing which is filling up lots of newly built prisons? Perhaps it is your intention to set up a contradiction which exposes your private club as a bunch of extremists. Even so, it might be more convincing to suggest that current judicial policy is soft, that lots of prisons are emptying because the new politicos believe in leniency....I have a feeling these paragraphs could be made leaner.

That said, this is a refreshingly good read, full of interest and straightforward, lively writing. I am enjoying it very much.

All the best

Fran Macilvey, "Trapped" :-))

FRAN MACILVEY wrote 55 days ago

Dear Philip

As I have been reading this, I have been hardly aware that it was uploaded here. Feels like a book. Not my usual read. But I am thoroughly enjoying it. Four chapters in, I am interested in what is happening and looking forward to more. I like the set up: the characters feel real and very well portrayed. The scenes are well drawn and the pace is good. There are enough questions in my mind, so that I am happy to keep reading.

The action and dialogue feel much tighter and more convincing than the theorising. The fourth section of chapter 1, where the old boy net is discussing law and order, feels a bit heavy and there seems to be a central contradiction. If the Chief Justice so keen on "soft" option like community service, why does there also seem to be a policy of exemplary sentencing which is filling up lots of newly built prisons? Perhaps it is your intention to set up a contradiction which exposes your private club as a bunch of extremists. Even so, it might be more convincing to suggest that current judicial policy is soft, that lots of prisons are emptying because the new politicos believe in leniency....I have a feeling these paragraphs could be made leaner.

That said, this is a refreshingly good read, full of interest and straightforward, lively writing. I am enjoying it very much.

All the best

Fran Macilvey, "Trapped" :-))

philip john wrote 65 days ago

Dear Philip,
Really? This is a book that I would by and recommend to anyone! Such true feelings that I feel about my government! And The most amazing way is that your words tell the story! Highly rated and a place on my shelf as soon as I can! Excelllent and yeah am reading more despite wanting to read other. WEll done
Josphine
Notime goes bye



Dear Josphine,

Many thanks for these very generous remarks. I have taken a quick peek at Notime goes bye and logged it for future reading. I can see straight away that it is beautifully written.

Best wishes

Philip John

Atieno wrote 65 days ago

Dear Philip,
Really? This is a book that I would by and recommend to anyone! Such true feelings that I feel about my government! And The most amazing way is that your words tell the story! Highly rated and a place on my shelf as soon as I can! Excelllent and yeah am reading more despite wanting to read other. WEll done
Josphine
Notime goes bye

jack hudson wrote 69 days ago

Will comment more later. Still reading and enjoying, especially your character development. For your information, "Warm-Up Kills" is now complete on the site.

jack hudson wrote 70 days ago

Arresting first chapter. I will read on. What is their plan? I'm intrigued.

Nick Cullen wrote 81 days ago

P.S I've just noticed a red arrow beside the book. Clearly the website is broken. Mods get the techies on the case quick as something is clearly wrong.

Nick Cullen wrote 81 days ago

I like to leave the editing to the editors. So, from a reader's perspective....clearly you're joking putting this up? Come on, own up! This has been published and is on many 'actual' shelves in bookshops right? You're taunting us aren't you? If the answers to my questions are incredulously 'NO' then you've either kept this excellent piece of work locked away, hidden from view or...or I'm gonna hang up my boots now because this is as good as it gets and is a couple of leagues above lots of things I've read. Your style is fantastic and the storyline is great. I'm hooked. I can't wait til the trouble maker appears. In fact, this is going straight onto my shelf.
Seriously, seriously good work here. It's when you read something like this you think "Damn, I really have to start writing better!"

Nick Cullen
Ghost Estate.

Fabrice Stuyvesant wrote 574 days ago

Great prose, lucid and fast moving. I like the efficient use of words. I'd say strenghten the cliff hangers at end of chapters though. Best of luck with this! Fabrice, Club Wars

child wrote 578 days ago

Dead Reckoning - This is a thriller with a great deal of class.
The writing is crisp, almost brusque, but with a hint of old world charm and good manners thrown in. Charles du Randt has the tiniest flicker of the unsavoury about him and Marc Dampier, a man unable to function properly without a cause to stimulate an adrenalin rush, carries more than a latent air of violence. Both characters are well drawn and believable as is the dialogue between them. The pace is not fast but somehow the author kept me reading far further than I had intended, in fact through five chapters. The sixth, I believe is where the action really gets going. I shall come back to read further wanting to know what the unexpected turn in the plot promised in the pitch is. A blooming good read.

Child - Atramentus Speaks

Colin Normanshaw wrote 579 days ago

Nicely written. A good pace to start this book, with plenty of hooks to keep the reader interested. Dialogue is sharp, and we are neatly drawn into Charles du Randt's life without really knowing its hidden secrets. Backed with pleasure. Colin

Richard J. Dean Jr. wrote 583 days ago

Thank you for your support for Twin Fates! I came by to check out your novel and found it to be quite enjoyable. Well-written, with clear, realistic dialogue. I can see this as a movie one day. Great setting.
~Richard
Twin Fates

marywood18 wrote 583 days ago

Intrigue and suspense and a promise of a lot more to come. Well done. You have such a fantastic premise here and one that promises a cracking read. I would agree with Cheryl Kaye Tardiff, let your characters tell the story rather that yourself. By you telling it, you head hop, giving the thoughts of Charles and then the driver and then the men in the group. Better that we know this through charles's point of view. Using third person you can have other characters take the point of view as long as you have a break in between each change so the reader expects it. This is not a criticism, just advice as this work so deserves showcasing at its best, the material is fresh and the story line is gripping, promises of a best seller. There are some tips on my blog, the address is on my profile, but there are also a lot of 'how to' books out there which could help you with this. Good luck. Thank you for backing mine and yours is going right now to my bookshelf, which often leads to more backing from my friends on here as we tend to review what the others have done. Not by any arrangement between us, but it is something I have noticed in my news feeds, and know I often pick my next lot of books from what they have read. Hope this happens for you. love Mary

SRFire wrote 588 days ago

This is intriguing. We have plenty to hook us from chapter 1 to 2. Backed with pleasure, Sana

Bocri wrote 595 days ago

Instant immersion. The first line of Dead Reckoning pulls the reader in and makes him part of the action right from the start. The writing is crisp, almost curt but certainly business-like in a literary sense for this genre; unembellished, economic, not quite laconic and to the point. It does what it says on the tin and does not disappoint. No glitches. BACKED. Robert Davidson. The Tuzla Run

Cheryl Kaye Tardif wrote 599 days ago

This story has a lot of potential, which is why I'm going to offer some advice.

It started off good, with action, dialogue and intrigue. After the first scene, though, you slipped into too much tell and not enough show. This makes a reader want to scroll down for a break of whitespace. Try adding more dialogue (internal or actual) to break up the narrative, especially when in Charles's POV. Let HIM tell the story. :-)

Cheryl Kaye Tardif,
bestselling suspense author
http://www.cherylktardif.com
All the best

Gingernut wrote 605 days ago

one of the best things ive read for a long time

Gingernut

JD Revene wrote 605 days ago

Philip

This is an interesting story, a rather old-fashioned thriller, with a leisurely set up.

The style is relaxed and proper and your main character develops with a little of the James Bond about him, whilst secondary characters remain--on the whole--in the chapter.

I think the pace suits the style, but there might be places you could add some dynamism to it by playing out some of the scenes you report--for example the club luncheons--even if only in part.

Nonetheless, backed

LonnieNonnie wrote 606 days ago

This is a genre I like. I know one has to set the scene, but I am into chapter three and no hint yet of what makes this different, as the (good) pitch suggests. I understand sometimes one has to read on, but this Authonomy gives one ADD, or ADS, and I suspect I am the average reader. Attention span of a gnat. Might I suggest you plant the odd line which hints at why we should keep turning pages. The pace is a bit slow, for me, but you are a very competent writer, so... use it, lose it. Backed for potential. The Tails of Willie Gusty.

A. Zoomer wrote 608 days ago

DEAD RECKONING

Dear Philip,
I love the beginning- it is sharp and abrupt. I am in the story.
The dialogue rings true.
This is excellent.
Backed with pleasure,
A Zoomer

D. L. Stroupe wrote 612 days ago

This appears to be a complex and detailed story - and what is a crime story without details? I skipped the first chapter because that's so often all anyone reads but this doesn't lend well to that treatment. As you said of mine, this is not my genre, but your story seems to be rich in regards to information which is the sort of thing that readers of crime stories enjoy so that they can glean the clues for themselves without it being too obviously handed to them.

John G Cyprus wrote 615 days ago

Hi Philip. An excellent premise and intriguing pitch make me want to back this.
However I think it can be improved considerably with a different approach.
There is a premise that one should show rather than tell. Especially the development of your character which is given to us as an info dump right up front. It would be better if we were allowed to find out about him as the story unfolds. The reporting of the series of meetings could be summarised by dramatising the meeting in which he finally agrees to carry out the wishes of the group.
The first chapter is so important and in this genre should hit the reader between the eyes. I would suggest that you move the first bit of action right to the front and then fill in the back-story with a flashback or two.
I will put it on my watch list and await further developments.
Thanks for backing 'The Last Olympiad'
John G

Elizabeth Wolfe wrote 615 days ago

Dear Philip,
Your writing is direct, clear and minimal. I like it very much! There isn't one wasted word in your first chapter. That's hard to accomplish. The tone is so even and understated, you may consider adding in a hint of what's to come to make sure you keep the reader's interest (for those readers who have attention deficit.) Perhaps a little extra excitement for those folks. I am a big fan of your writing!

BACKED
Elizabeth Wolfe (MEMORIES OF GLORY)

Sarah King wrote 619 days ago

This has a compelling pitch that seems right out of an action thriller movie. The writing starts of really well with some engrossing first lines. It is stilted a bit by the back story that I feel makes too early an entrance and breaks up the action. I would prefer to see it gradually revealed through dialogue or at least at a later stage in the book so that the action is not broken up. I have already backed this. The writing is quality and the story compelling. Good luck with it. Sarah

John Warren-Anderson wrote 621 days ago

A good thriller that quickly establishes tension and maintains it. Very well done.

Rosemary Peel wrote 629 days ago

I read and backed this book a while ago and after it came off my shelf it stayed on my watchlist. Hoping that the 'new system' is in operation, I am putting it back on my shelf as it is still one of the best books -for me- on this site.

CarolinaAl wrote 630 days ago

This is a captivating thriller with interesting and well fleshed out characters. Fresh dialogue. Vivid descriptions. Compelling narrative. Tailored writing. An entertaining read. Backed.

nsllee wrote 632 days ago

Hi Philip

This is a great idea and the writing is very professional. My only hesitation is that the description of the genesis of the plot is not dramatised, but simply told to us. The characters and the milieu are credible and I look forward to seeing how it unfolds. Backed.

Nicole
Chosen

Larry789 wrote 633 days ago

One, the pitch is good, got me from the get go. Two this book is a good read. Strong characters and a plausible plot. Enjoying this!

Barry Wenlock wrote 637 days ago

A well-written and enjoyable piece of writing. A true thriller.
Backed with pleasure,
Barry

Jehmka wrote 638 days ago

"But he enjoyed good food. Fine wines. Brandy and a cigar. And being away by two thirty."
Is it me..? or is that really one sentence disguised as four?

"From the day he had left the army, in fact." This is, in no way, a complete sentence. I’ve seen chopped off sentences used on occasion for a certain effect… “A pause.” “Just two more steps…” that sort of thing. I’ve used this method at times to create tension, or to reduce interference in dialogue.
"…intelligence gathering was in his blood and was something he knew he had to do, if his business were to flourish. As it invariably did." There are certain moments in your story where these broken sentences make sense to me, but many that cause me to stop where there should be no stop. I feel that the content is there, the story makes sense, and is in fact very interesting and engaging, but the flow is perhaps unnaturally broken.
I’m backing the book regardless of my issues with sentence structure. I find the story enjoyable.

Best of luck with this…

Rodney Jones
Bible Stories

berseba wrote 642 days ago

Philip. I have read four of your chapters and have put it on my watchlist for future reference, because I have got to see how this one turns out. I love the idea of a group of people (why no women though?) planing to strike back at the criminals, I just wish this was real life. Your narrative is great, succinct and to the point. I also like the fact that Marc is a bit of a down and out and not too full of himself, like the usual run of the mill badasses in Andy McNab's novels for instance. ( Though having said that I do like them too). I can't wait to see how Marc turns out. I'll be going back to this very shortly. Well done Philip. Backed for definate. Berseba.

celticwriter wrote 642 days ago

Thank you Philip John for your very kind comment, and for your backing. I find your own work flows easily, and very visual. Working as a scriptwriter, I do appreciate good dialogue. Nice!

jim

grantdavid wrote 643 days ago

Philip, "Dead Reckoning" (what a good title!) has an underlying theme which is bound to be popular with many a reader. Whether or not this fact is popular is immaterial. It's fiction, after all, and true fiction!
Your crisp style and strong characters command attention. Charles may seem dated - Forsyth, Fleming and Archer and even Buchan have been cited here, but for me that does not spoil very much. Certainly very English in both atmosphere and geography, and no one can deny the lure of the story.
Just one query - isn't the Portsmouth newspaper still The Evening News?
I'm more convinced about this book than by any other on the site, so far. Backed with pleasure

Frank James wrote 644 days ago

To Philip John'

This is a good, well put together story that I liked, a bigger book than usual. I liked what I managed to read and will hopefull read the rest in a day or two. My pleasure to BACK it.

Frank James (The Contractor)

KW wrote 647 days ago

I wish I could "put the information and gossip" I "had picked up over lunch to good use." I need to added to the Wayne fortune. Rather, I spend a little too much time reading books on this site. Yours, however, is not a waste of time. I'm enjoying it very much, but find myself very jealous of Charles du Randt. I don't know if I want the challenges, though. Oh, but "something simply had to be done" with "the never ending downward spiral on crime." Charles takes up the challenge that is offered and off you go with this thrilling book. I'll be back to read more when I get a little more time. Backed for now.

fletcherkovich wrote 657 days ago

Philip-

I can feel the thrill in your book.
I love the conflict that you displayed in the story. It makes the reader feel the confusion and choose which sides to stand as the story unveils the truth and unmask the mystery. I admire your creative mind producing such high quality masterpiece. The characterization is magnetic to readers. Plot is simple but very comprehensive through using very realistic dialogues. This deserves to get a spot on my shelf. I have already backed this work before. Good luck.

FLETCH
STORIES FROM A LEAKING MIND

Rosemary Peel wrote 657 days ago

I wasn't sure about this from the pitch - nothing wrong with it, just seemed like more of a man's book. How wrong can you be? I found the first chapter absolutely riviting, a totally compulsive read. The writing is clear and consise, it pulls the reader along, drawing him/her into the, as yet unknown, plot. The political discussions hit home with a good too many truths and at one point I wondered was I really reading fiction? I loved it! Will certainly read it to the end, even if it is only in fits and starts (the only way you can read a full book on Authonomy - or at least the only way I can). Backed without hesitation and looking forward to seeing it in print, which I feel sure, cannot be too long in coming.

WendyB wrote 664 days ago

A delightful, easy read. Smooth style, appealing premise...what better way to spend a lazy summer day than to read about someone actually doing something.

Well done. Escapist literature at its best.

Wendy Bertsch
(Once More...From the Beginning)

klouholmes wrote 665 days ago

Hi Philip, The synopsis brought me in and I liked the delivery of the story. Charles' house in the country, the background about Tul, and Charles' diffident personality while he tends to his operation arouse the curiosity. The writing calls up pictures too. It's intriguing - Shelved - Katherine (The Swan Bonnet)

12