Book Jacket

 

rank 1816
word count 36606
date submitted 08.12.2010
date updated 19.12.2011
genres: Literary Fiction, Romance, Comedy
classification: universal
incomplete

The Year of Living Philosophically

Robert Grossmith

Can philosophy improve the love life of terminally single Dave Gardner? From hedonist and stoic to existentialist and postmodernist, he tries to find out.

 

Bored with his job as a bilingual dictionary editor at a Norwich publishing house, Dave decides to spend the next twelve months living according to the prescriptions of twelve different philosophies, one each month, chosen at random from a Duffer's Guide to philosophy. His purpose is to see whether any of these philosophical systems will improve his blighted existence and aid his pursuit of the office hottie, Vanessa.
Trouble is, Vanessa's already engaged to the dodgy (and mysteriously wealthy) Dominic. Dave suspects Dom of nefarious activities -- cigarette smuggling? cannabis farming? -- and turns detective in order to expose him, with unexpected results. So overpowering is Dave's infatuation with Vanessa that he barely notices the attention he's receiving from another colleague, the eminently more suitable new secretary Jo.
Month after month, Dave's philosophical experiment backfires in spectacular fashion. His pain-control exercises during his stoic month leave him requiring urgent medical attention. His attempts to live as a rationalist, an empiricist and a logical positivist -- whatever that is -- bring further disasters. As New Year's Eve approaches, he finds himself jobless, penniless, friendless and more single than ever, with only one day left in which to turn his life around.

 
rate the book

to rate this book please Register or Login

 

tags

on 21 watchlists

21 comments

 

To leave comments on this or any book please Register or Login

subscribe to comments for this book
Ray007 wrote 531 days ago

Wow! There are not many books (hardly any in fact) which make me laugh out loud, but this one has on many occasions. Can't wait to read the rest. The fact that it is thought-provoking, sensitively crafted, very well-written, and manages to convey complex ideas ('philosophies') in such a natural and engaging narrative way is all the more to its credit. I generally find books either slop or onerously hard-going. For me, Robert Grossmith hits just the right spot: : A funny, intelligent, and most enjoyable read. In a word - classy.

mick hanson wrote 244 days ago

This is really good fun. It moves well and is highly entertaining, and the last paragraph where he uses determinism in a practical sense gave me a dose of the giggles. I cringed, I just couldn't help it. Excellent and backed - Wilfred

belia wrote 259 days ago

Original, knowledgable, clever, funny, irresistible... Backed and starred.

All the best, and honestly hoping to see it in print.

Evangeline (belia)

xavant wrote 305 days ago

At last I've come across a piece of fiction on this site that isn't escapist but that engages instead with the everyday in a thought-provoking, intelligent and witty narrative - and that's also impeccably written. In the three chapters I've read you've managed to portray the narrator's philosophical explorations in a readable, easily assimilable way. You've done this of course by admirably concrete applications of the different systems, rooted in laddish reality. The diary form is well chosen, too, since it creates an intimate narrative voice that draws in readers who might otherwise find the subject of a wide-ranging philosophical investigation - even in the jokey approach you've employed - a little daunting. When I say the writing is impeccable, I mean of course that it is, unusually here, technically flawless and is also a consistently well maintained fusion of the demotic and the intellectual.
I'm not sure how well this would sell, but I'd hope there's enough of an intelligent readership out there to make it commercially viable on a modest scale. Here it's unjust that it's found a place on only seven bookshelves. I'm making that eight and I'm also six-starring it. Good luck with it.
Xavant
That Certain Feeling

Roman N Marek wrote 526 days ago

This is a lovely and amusing idea. It brings to mind that long line of diary-writing duffers who have gone before: Pooter, Adrian Mole, Simon Crisp and (my personal favourite) Darren Tackle. (You’re not by an chance a descendant of George or Weedon, are you?? Or does everyone ask you that?) Having said that, they are all hard acts to follow and, for me, the early chapters don’t quite make it. I wondered whether they are strong enough to hook the general reader. They’re still an interesting read, but the incidents are only sporadically amusing (containing some lovely ideas and nice lines, mind). However, come Chapter 5, with the pain-control episode and the ‘bizarre ironing accident’, and it all takes off. This part was really funny, and after that I found myself sitting back and enjoying the book more and more. Perhaps, until that point, the MC hadn’t been foolish or Pooterish enough. But here he is shown to be a right idiot – which is funny. And from that point on, I loved it. Now I’m puzzled why I didn’t like the first four chapters so much. Maybe I was just having a bad day(!). Let’s see if anyone else has the same impression, or the same bad day. I’m glad I persevered beyond Chapter 4 as the rest of it has put a smile on my face!

Juliet Ann wrote 155 days ago

About to begin Platonist - really enjoying it. One minor point is it Cat or Trouble?

mick hanson wrote 244 days ago

This is really good fun. It moves well and is highly entertaining, and the last paragraph where he uses determinism in a practical sense gave me a dose of the giggles. I cringed, I just couldn't help it. Excellent and backed - Wilfred

Laura Bailey wrote 254 days ago

Hi Robert,

Thanks for the read, I enjoyed this. I like your modern take contrasted with age-old philosophy. I also like how you subtly move between tenses and I think in the first chapter you introduce Vanessa well.

My nitpick would be from the first chapter, I'm not sure that Jerome is fully believable. On the one hand he seems a tad geeky and he has hairy hands but on the other, he seems very brash and I'd imagine polished if he is able to kiss a group of girls, one of whom in particular is "not bad". I don't think that woulld take much fixing. I'd perhaps go either a bit geeky and in his drunken mindset he tries it on with the girls but they knock him back or kiss him then giggle etc. Or, go for the polished approach and remove the reference to the hairy hand and have him in a suit and smart hair etc. Something like that, anyway. Obviously this is just a suggestion but I do think it would just tie up your opening, which I think is engaging.

Hope this is useful.

Best wishes,

Laura
Beneath The Blossom Tree

CBK wrote 256 days ago

A great idea - obviously there is a danger of being seen as just copying other books with a similar premise theme - but that doesn't bother me one bit - even just reading the pitch makes me want to see the impact these different philosphies has on your everyday life - backed and 5 stars.

CBK

Robert Grossmith wrote 258 days ago

Thanks for the comments on the book, which I'll take on board. I wish you'd read more than the first day though -- the consensus is that it gets better with each chapter. Glad you like the Norwich location too. It happens to be where I live but you're right, it is under-represented in fiction (and Norfolk's always good for a few cheap laughs). Jeeves & Wooster: hadn't thought of that but, yes, I can see it. But perhaps more like Withnail & I.

iandsmith wrote 258 days ago

Congratulations on Wednesday one to watch. It’s always a good choice, and this one is no exception.

So here’s my bit: I know it’s New Years Day, but hangovers in novels? It’s great. I have no problems with hangovers, but I’ve seen three hangovers this week on authonomy. There must be new ways to say the same thing: they overdosed on something suspect from the garden centre perhaps. Maybe they stagger out on New Years Day, and are suddenly struck by that disease that turns your bones to biscuit.

Anyway, getting over the hangover as a way of emphasizing that they’re fun characters, I think Jerome goes into the drunken philosophy far too quickly, for too long, and too coherently to be convincing.

It’s set in Norwich. Fantastic. I looked it up. I maybe wrong, but Ketts Hill, Tombland. Got to be. That’s very interesting. Not London? Not Oxford? Not Cambridge? Not Devon? Excellent. Norwich is a refreshing location for a novel on authonomy.

In fact, Dave and Jerome are very interesting indeed. Despite being drunk, they don’t swear, they get away with fondling women in the street so they can’t be working class or black. They seem to be trying very hard to be straight, and Dave even says, “Maybe they thought I was Jerome’s gay best friend.” They’re likeable, nearly foppish. At one point I thought of Wooster and Jeeves, and imagined it might be Oxford (Magdelen Street) or Cambridge. But no, it’s Norfolk, and that’s good, and I’m not onto January 2nd yet. Maybe they need college scarves, wobbly bicycles. I will Watchlist, and keep an eye on developments. Very good.

belia wrote 259 days ago

Original, knowledgable, clever, funny, irresistible... Backed and starred.

All the best, and honestly hoping to see it in print.

Evangeline (belia)

xavant wrote 305 days ago

At last I've come across a piece of fiction on this site that isn't escapist but that engages instead with the everyday in a thought-provoking, intelligent and witty narrative - and that's also impeccably written. In the three chapters I've read you've managed to portray the narrator's philosophical explorations in a readable, easily assimilable way. You've done this of course by admirably concrete applications of the different systems, rooted in laddish reality. The diary form is well chosen, too, since it creates an intimate narrative voice that draws in readers who might otherwise find the subject of a wide-ranging philosophical investigation - even in the jokey approach you've employed - a little daunting. When I say the writing is impeccable, I mean of course that it is, unusually here, technically flawless and is also a consistently well maintained fusion of the demotic and the intellectual.
I'm not sure how well this would sell, but I'd hope there's enough of an intelligent readership out there to make it commercially viable on a modest scale. Here it's unjust that it's found a place on only seven bookshelves. I'm making that eight and I'm also six-starring it. Good luck with it.
Xavant
That Certain Feeling

Steve Kata wrote 318 days ago

Your book is very well written. Only a few typos I'm sure you'll fix in the editorial process. I like your writing style and the diary format makes the read move along quickly. I've had a lifelong interest in philosophy (and humor) myself, so I'm interested in seeing where you go with this. I've starred and watched it. I wouldn't mind at all if you checked out my 'Renouncing the Future.' You might find it fun

Best,
Steve

Chris Brown wrote 510 days ago

Over the last few years, I've started reading many books on here, but I've only got past chapter 1 on a minimal number of occasions, It took me a while to warm to your main guy, but by mid february, I sure have and the general idea is brilliant - I want to keep reading just to see what you'll do with the next philosophical bent. And your MC gets more believable as time goes on. In ch1, you can't quite work out why he'd be interested in phillosophy and it all looks like a plot device but after that, it's all very natural and one starts to strongly empathise. If you rework ch 1 a little to make it more believable, I think I might actually pay money...

Roman N Marek wrote 526 days ago

This is a lovely and amusing idea. It brings to mind that long line of diary-writing duffers who have gone before: Pooter, Adrian Mole, Simon Crisp and (my personal favourite) Darren Tackle. (You’re not by an chance a descendant of George or Weedon, are you?? Or does everyone ask you that?) Having said that, they are all hard acts to follow and, for me, the early chapters don’t quite make it. I wondered whether they are strong enough to hook the general reader. They’re still an interesting read, but the incidents are only sporadically amusing (containing some lovely ideas and nice lines, mind). However, come Chapter 5, with the pain-control episode and the ‘bizarre ironing accident’, and it all takes off. This part was really funny, and after that I found myself sitting back and enjoying the book more and more. Perhaps, until that point, the MC hadn’t been foolish or Pooterish enough. But here he is shown to be a right idiot – which is funny. And from that point on, I loved it. Now I’m puzzled why I didn’t like the first four chapters so much. Maybe I was just having a bad day(!). Let’s see if anyone else has the same impression, or the same bad day. I’m glad I persevered beyond Chapter 4 as the rest of it has put a smile on my face!

Ray007 wrote 531 days ago

Wow! There are not many books (hardly any in fact) which make me laugh out loud, but this one has on many occasions. Can't wait to read the rest. The fact that it is thought-provoking, sensitively crafted, very well-written, and manages to convey complex ideas ('philosophies') in such a natural and engaging narrative way is all the more to its credit. I generally find books either slop or onerously hard-going. For me, Robert Grossmith hits just the right spot: : A funny, intelligent, and most enjoyable read. In a word - classy.

Ray007 wrote 531 days ago

Wow! There are not many books (hardly any in fact) which make me laugh out loud, but this one has on many occasions. Can't wait to read the rest. The fact that it is thought-provoking, sensitively crafted, very well-written, and manages to convey complex ideas ('philosophies') in such a natural and engaging narrative way is all the more to its credit. I generally find books either slop or onerously hard-going. For me, Robert Grossmith hits just the right spot: : A funny, intelligent, and most enjoyable read. Classy!

Tim Andrewartha wrote 531 days ago

I have now enjoyed reading to the end of chapter 3. It's a good introduction to different kinds of philosophy as well as being entertaining fiction. The Monday lunch time disco is most amusing. In chapter 2 it says: "Did nothing rest of the day." I thought this should be "Did nothing for the rest of the day." Tim

lindajabo wrote 532 days ago

Love it and it keeps getting better!

SusieGulick wrote 533 days ago

Dear Robert, I love that you tell in your pitch, that Dave is having a different philosophical life each month & your books is his keeping a diary of his experiences in it :) - what a wonderful idea. :) I didn't even know that there were that many different philosophies, even. :) "Love is a serious mental disease" made me laugh at Plato's quote. "Moon Goddess" was good :) - if I were he, I would have chanced it with his family. :) "Fortune is like a woman" was pretty bad , but I don't know if being hung by his hands at his back was a good punishment for all of his evil :( - must have really happened, so I'm glad I wasn't him :) - I laughed at the "manipulating others" goal. :( I learned so much in your book, you wouldn't believe. :) I have read, commented on, & put your book on my watchlist to read & to at least 24 hour back when space opens on my bookshelf. :) I have also gold ******-rated your book :) - could you please ****** & back my memoirs/testimony book, in return? :) Thank you from the bottom of my heart. :) Love, Susie :) p.s. every ******-ing & at least 24 hour backing moves our book up on authonomy lists :) - click on author's name, scroll down on their profile page, click on their book cover or title :) - & you are on your way :)
None of this comment is copy/pasted & is written my best from my heart. :)

piabjo wrote 533 days ago

My rating is 5 star! Hope more will read it!
Björk

piabjo wrote 533 days ago

Great Book!
Have read all of it when does the next chapter arrive?
PB

Robert Grossmith wrote 533 days ago

Thanks for the compliments, Tim -- and the typo! Hope you read on.

This is brilliant. I read the first chapter and I really enjoyed it. It's a great idea, witty and well written. It's easy to feel sympathy for the MC and to follow his thoughts. The dialogue is natural too. I spotted one typo. "I thought he was gong to say." According determinism then it was already decided that I would stumble on this amusing book and happily back it. I will return to read more at some point.
Tim
VITALITY

Tim Andrewartha wrote 533 days ago

This is brilliant. I read the first chapter and I really enjoyed it. It's a great idea, witty and well written. It's easy to feel sympathy for the MC and to follow his thoughts. The dialogue is natural too. I spotted one typo. "I thought he was gong to say." According determinism then it was already decided that I would stumble on this amusing book and happily back it. I will return to read more at some point.
Tim
VITALITY

SusieGulick wrote 533 days ago

:) I will comment after I've read your book - read & commented on 9 hours later :)

1