Book Jacket

 

rank 4191 (-115)
word count 92968
date submitted 31.10.2008
date updated 21.02.2009
genres: Fiction, Chick Lit, Instructional, ...
classification: moderate
complete

PlayStations and Pooh

Edmund Farrow

 

One housedad's struggle to remain chirpy in a world full of sleep-deprived women and toddlers with toilet issues.

 

Meet Ed. Everyone always thinks Ed has the day off. Why else would he be out and about with three small children? But Ed has a wife with a paying job and a belief that parents should screw up their own kids rather than leaving it to strangers. Most importantly, he also has a pen-pal...

'PlayStations and Pooh' is written as a series of emails sent by a veteran housedad to encourage another housedad who is much nearer the start of his career. Unlike most depictions of housedads, Ed is happy and competent rather than repressed and hopeless. He just has a tendency to find himself in awkward situations surrounded by crazy people. Through dealing with these disasters, he passes on his knowledge of how to survive as a stay-at-home parent.

As he describes it, 'The hours are long, the holidays are rubbish, the pay's a joke and there's heavy exposure to toxic biological waste. On the plus side, there's plenty of fresh air and exercise, a steady supply of hugs, relatively little stress, strong job satisfaction and an army of amusing minions. You also get to play 'Hungry Hippos' and call it work.'

 
 

tags

blokes, children, computer games, corporate madness, dads, family, gadgets, housedad, humour, parenthacks, parenting, survival, zombies

on 11 bookshelves

on 9 watchlists

65 comments

 

To leave comments on this or any book please Register or Login

subscribe to comments for this book
T Kirby-Jones wrote 559 days ago

I was not supposed to read an entire book today. I was really meant to be doing other things. I have not done any other things.

This is one of the most amusing books on this site. So well written, so engaging, and apparently a sufficiently compulsive page turner that I have lost half a day’s work

Some favourites of mine:

In this politically correct age, every individual has an equal right to an outlandish and deviant lifestyle. Ha ha ha.

Don’t confuse Hopeful Trepidation with Blind Optimism, however – always travel with a pack of babywipes, a change of socks, three spare nappies and a big stick.

Children as pokemon – brilliant.

TKJ – How To Kill Your Housemates

bluestocking wrote 645 days ago

Laughing my fool head off. How did I miss this for so long!!? I am racing to put this on my shelf really fast and coming back for more. You are an amazing comic genius. Your copy is impeccable. There is not a syllable to be altered (ok I am only through Ch. 1 and will be back if and when I run across anything.) And it's an epistolary novel! My favorite! Maybe it can be serialized, and hordes of people here in the U.S. will be waiting at port cities for the next installment, like with Dickens! I feel sure of it. Thank you, thank you.

Mockingbird wrote 652 days ago

Even on a third or fourth reading this is totally priceless........ my stomach muscles are still getting a good laugh work out..... I have avoided taking coffee at the same time, beverages snorted over my ageing laptop won't do it much good.........

Nix wrote 655 days ago

Hello Edmund,
As promised, I'm back to read P and P. My, this is hilarious! I had a horrible feeling it was going to be Woman's Weekly trite stuff, but no! This is really well written, original and so witty my face was aching from grinning. (Been there, done that...) There are so many great one-liners, and I had such a clear picture of life as a housedad. Your narrative voice is excellent and the character just shines through.

This book is a real find and flies up on to my shelf. I shall plug it in the forum, and I hope my shelving rockets it way past that pathetic 154 position.

Would appreciate a glance at C&C if you have the time. I can certainly learn from your ability to communicate humour.

Nicky
(Chickens and Churchbells)

AJK wrote 661 days ago

Hi Edward. Wonderful! I have 3 children my youngest 5,middle 14 and eldest 15. So toddlers and teens. (good title!) You picked up on some truly classic bits there. Funny,well written and so spot on. I can imagine every wife buying this for the hubbie!! onto my shelf!!

hamishun wrote 188 days ago

Hilarious!!!!!
Virginia Owen
It Never Rains In Paradise

JessRo wrote 207 days ago

Had me laughing all the way through and I didn't want to stop reading! Really enjoyed it and could happily reread.

jammer wrote 269 days ago

Great title and pitch. Good writing style. I've enjoyed what I've read so far. Backed.

Anne Wright wrote 425 days ago

Just took the chance to read another email before logging off. Absolutely delighted to read of your time in St Andrews. Our last visit was to our daughter's graduation many years ago and it is a place very dear to our hearts. We stayed there several times during her time at the University but, from your account, quite a few changes have occurred since our last visit. Thank you for the memory! Regards, Anne
PS I'm delighted to see P & P still on the authonomy site!!

Anne Wright wrote 430 days ago

Hello Ed, Although you may appreciate my time on authonomy has to be briefer than it has been up to now, I just could not logout without taking a peep at another of your emails. As ever, I have been cheered up beyond words (any thought of the impending operation disperses whenever I enter your realm of a man in a woman's world.) Keep it up; I'll get to the end . . . eventually . . . and then, what will I do whenever I feel low??!! Regards, Anne

Anne Wright wrote 435 days ago

Hello Ed I have had to make a very difficult decision (cf my new profile entry) and to make me feel better have read another of your emails. What will I do when they are all gone??!! Thank you very much for your support and good luck with your writing. I still intend to take a look at your website when I can. Regards, Anne

Anne Wright wrote 440 days ago

Hello Ed, My book isn't doing so well, my eye operation gets closer, my spirits are somewhat low . . . so, what do I do? Give myself a good dose of Playstations and Pooh, that's what! Your description of "life with children" is so 'on the mark' and your sense of humour . . . or is it paranoia? . . . is fantastic; and getting better. What will I do to cheer myself up when I run out of your emails? Good luck! Regards, Anne

Anne Wright wrote 455 days ago

Hello Ed, I can't believe you have a red arrow again! Some people have no sense of humour . . . or realism! Regards, Anne

Anne Wright wrote 456 days ago

PS Sadly, The Apartment, has begun to fall for the first time since I resubmitted it!!

Anne Wright wrote 456 days ago

Hello Ed, I am delighted to see that Play Stations and Pooh is rising! It would be most gratifying if my reading and commenting on it had something to do with this. Regards, Anne

Anne Wright wrote 457 days ago

Hello Ed, I just can't leave authonomy without spending my last few minutes with your emails. Don't think I would sleep if I didn't get my nightly 'fix'! Must go, have been on the site for ages; my husband thinks I've deserted him!! Regards, Anne

Anne Wright wrote 458 days ago

Hello Ed, Have read more and continue to be enthralled. I just LOVED your email about the 'benefits' of CBBC and CBeebies! Could I be cheeky and add In the Night Garden to your United Nations world disaster support items? (I should say, however, that my husband thinks there is rather a large deal of covert sexuality portrayed in all the kissing and cuddling . . . better than biffing each other over the head, I say!!). I look forward to your next email! Regards, Anne

Anne Wright wrote 459 days ago

Hello Ed. Oh how I wish I had the whole day at my disposal to read all of your work in one go! I have only managed to find the time to read two more of your emails and am absolutely AMAZED that your work does not seem to be getting the plaudits it deserves. You are so easy to read, I can relate to everything you say . . . as I said, I have two of my own and two gorgeous but madly mysterious grandchildren . . . and find it difficult to imagine that more people have not climbed on your 'band-wagon!' It is a sad indictment of modern day living that writing of such intellect, enlightenment and insight into REAL life is not number one on the authonomy list. I can't wait until my next visit to your 'woman's world!' Good luck, regards, Anne

Anne Wright wrote 462 days ago

Dear Ed, I just love it!!! I've only read your first two letters but I can hardly type for laughing! As a mother of two, one girl and one boy, and a gran of two of the most lively, bright, boisterous and extremely lovable 4 and 2 year olds, I can immerse myself totally in your work to the detriment of all the domestic and family matters which cause me to have very little time to read my favourites on authonomy; I believe something will have to change there!!! You have captured admirably the feelings of a man in what was once always regarded as a woman's world. I can only presume that you are a wonderful Dad to some very lucky children! I honestly cannot believe that your work is not soaring to the skies. It just serves to prove how much the literary world and the reading public has dropped its standards in recent years. I can't wait to read more. Regards, Anne

Anne Wright wrote 467 days ago

Hello Edmund, I've just returned to authonomy.com following an absence of several weeks - I've just resubmitted one of my books, The Apartment, which I hope you might find time to dip into, although I have to warn you this is more likely to appeal to the female reader; having said that, perhaps a housedad might just enjoy bits of it! I am intrigued both by your title and precis. I don't have too much time to spend on the website but I have added your book to my watchlist and will look into it as soon as I am able. Good Luck, Anne (Wright)

Karen Bessey Pease wrote 558 days ago

Ed, good morning!

This was great... you've captured parenthood-- dadhood-- perfectly and allowed others to glimpse the wonders of this grand experience. Your dry sense of humor shines through, and I'm sure your adventures and how you've coped with them will give many a mother a great sense of relief when she walks out the door.

Thank you, and all my best to you and your family. This MS will be an important part of your children's personal histories.

Yours,
Karen

T Kirby-Jones wrote 559 days ago

I was not supposed to read an entire book today. I was really meant to be doing other things. I have not done any other things.

This is one of the most amusing books on this site. So well written, so engaging, and apparently a sufficiently compulsive page turner that I have lost half a day’s work

Some favourites of mine:

In this politically correct age, every individual has an equal right to an outlandish and deviant lifestyle. Ha ha ha.

Don’t confuse Hopeful Trepidation with Blind Optimism, however – always travel with a pack of babywipes, a change of socks, three spare nappies and a big stick.

Children as pokemon – brilliant.

TKJ – How To Kill Your Housemates

Clare Wiltshire wrote 602 days ago

This is great - what a clever way to write a story. I like the way we are just reading Ed's e-mails and not Dave's! Also an interesting subject matter & a great title - which is what atttracted me!

Forget the WL - I am going to stick this straight on the shelf! Clare

Lesley Barker wrote 620 days ago

This is really great!

JHorger wrote 631 days ago

Ed--
Genius writing, even though it's on a frightening topic. I laugh, though I am sad and weary. As a father of a four-year old daughter here, I can concur that your work is saturated with the truth. Although I feel not a little like a wimp being worn out at the end of the day by one little headstrong hellion in a tutu. But you've hit on the point: children expand to fit the time you have. Non-parents don't get it, until...
Anyway, I'm backing your book at the end of the week. (Everyone gets 5 days on my shelf.) And hoping more readers flock your way, because P & P must have commercial appeal. Thanks for posting this!
--Jason

Yvonne wrote 634 days ago

I love your humor in all of this... enjoyed the read, and I have backed your book.
Yvonne

Edmund Farrow wrote 642 days ago

Hi Edmund,

I watchlisted Playstations and Pooh a while ago, but Bluestocking’s plug on the forums speeded up my arrival.

My first impression is this is a funny and astute book. You have a gift for observation, especially things like the screensaver coming down. I am also a ‘good listener’ and was right there with you! The letter format works well. Do we ever get to see any of the replies? I don’t think it necessary, just curious.

One thing to note. You use the phrase ‘sea of children’ twice, quite close together.

My major thought regarding this, is the very beginning. I wasn’t sure about his description of where he worked, and where the wife works. Felt like back story shoved in because it needed to be. I think you’d be far more effective putting this in an anecdote – I bumped into so-and-so from my old office. He gave me the low down on Scandinavian bound boss… etc. That way we, the reader, are more involved. The other thought I had was that do these letters have to start at the beginning of the penpal friendship? Would it perhaps not be more effective to have the friendship be more established? Just a thought that wouldn’t make huge changes (although it might – I haven’t read all the book) but might make the initial couple of letters flow a little better. I hope you don’t mind me coming along and making suggestions. I do like this, and think it’s got lots of potential. I’m putting this on my shelf.

Lisa



Hi, Lisa. Thanks for the feedback and the shelving. I appreciate it.

The book only contains Ed's letters, to keep things simple. The letter format has many advantages in terms of being able to give a personal narrative and to change subject quickly by moving onto another letter. One of the disadvantages is trying to pass on information to the reader without Ed treating Dave like an idiot. Starting at the beginning of the correspondence lets me do a quick introduction info dump after a few pages and then move on. Could it be more natural? Maybe - I'll have a look in my next edit. (*Shudders at the thought of YET ANOTHER edit*)

The 'sea of children' is repeat for effect. Whether it's a good effect is, of course, another question... (Will investigate.)

Thanks again.

All the best, Edmund.

bluestocking wrote 643 days ago

Hey! I put up a forum post about this but I thought of a new title for your book this morning right when I woke up!!!!

It is:

Prams and the Man

Is that a little too weird or obscure? do people even get into GB Shaw these days? He is a favorite of mine (aside from his crazy politics) so I was well pleased with myself when I thought of this. Anyhoo.

Ginger wrote 643 days ago

Hi Edmund,

I watchlisted Playstations and Pooh a while ago, but Bluestocking’s plug on the forums speeded up my arrival.

My first impression is this is a funny and astute book. You have a gift for observation, especially things like the screensaver coming down. I am also a ‘good listener’ and was right there with you! The letter format works well. Do we ever get to see any of the replies? I don’t think it necessary, just curious.

One thing to note. You use the phrase ‘sea of children’ twice, quite close together.

My major thought regarding this, is the very beginning. I wasn’t sure about his description of where he worked, and where the wife works. Felt like back story shoved in because it needed to be. I think you’d be far more effective putting this in an anecdote – I bumped into so-and-so from my old office. He gave me the low down on Scandinavian bound boss… etc. That way we, the reader, are more involved. The other thought I had was that do these letters have to start at the beginning of the penpal friendship? Would it perhaps not be more effective to have the friendship be more established? Just a thought that wouldn’t make huge changes (although it might – I haven’t read all the book) but might make the initial couple of letters flow a little better. I hope you don’t mind me coming along and making suggestions. I do like this, and think it’s got lots of potential. I’m putting this on my shelf.

Lisa

Edmund Farrow wrote 644 days ago

Higher prams! Yes! And not just for dads. Why are all women assumed to be 5’3’’, just because most of them are? (Sorry, you brought it all back for a moment. What I refer to as my Zombie Years, when I was certifiable from sleep-deprivation.)

An easy, amusing read, written in a clear style that slips down easily. This surely would sell rather well?



Cheers, Lexi.

Your mention of your Zombie Years of children-induced sleep deprivation makes me think. It suddenly occurs to me that this is maybe why I'm always so concerned about the possibility of undead invasion. It's just flashbacks to parent and toddler and spending hours in a room full of parents with shuffling gaits, vacant expressions and a groaning desire for coffee!

As for PlayStations and Pooh selling well... I guess that's always the hope. Personally, I think there'd be a strong Father's Day/Christmas gift market. Plus I could probably drum up some publicity via various specialist mags (gaming, parenting and Christian) with the right spin.

My phone's not exactly ringing off the hook yet, though ;-)

All the best, Edmund.

Lexi wrote 645 days ago

Higher prams! Yes! And not just for dads. Why are all women assumed to be 5’3’’, just because most of them are? (Sorry, you brought it all back for a moment. What I refer to as my Zombie Years, when I was certifiable from sleep-deprivation.)

Single fathers are even rarer than housedads, because women coo over them and rush in to help, then they are not single any more. They only last for about five minutes. But I digress.

‘Screensaver face’ – excellent. Karen… This is full of good bits. I also like the fact that it’s a man writing without moaning about how he hates his job, the people he works with, and he doesn’t get laid enough.

An easy, amusing read, written in a clear style that slips down easily. This surely would sell rather well?

bluestocking wrote 645 days ago

The really amazing thing is that I'm still totally guffawing, chapter after chapter. I haven't laughed this hard at a book for ages. Anybody as hilarious as you are doesn't need to worry two pins about character development or any of that hoo-haw, because I or anybody else would buy this after reading one page of it in a bookshop. It's such light, giddy humor, it doesn't come with a side order of Meaning (don't get me wrong, I loves me my satire too, very much.) It is just so much fun. I love it love it love it.

bluestocking wrote 645 days ago

Laughing my fool head off. How did I miss this for so long!!? I am racing to put this on my shelf really fast and coming back for more. You are an amazing comic genius. Your copy is impeccable. There is not a syllable to be altered (ok I am only through Ch. 1 and will be back if and when I run across anything.) And it's an epistolary novel! My favorite! Maybe it can be serialized, and hordes of people here in the U.S. will be waiting at port cities for the next installment, like with Dickens! I feel sure of it. Thank you, thank you.

Hannah wrote 647 days ago

Hi Edmund
I thought i'd dip in first and take a read of this book of yours - which seems to be flying up the weekly charts!
I read the first 2 chapters and my immediate thought was how well written and constructed this was. And no wonder people are backing it! I have a friend of mine who is a house-husband of 2 young boys. I know it hasn't been easy for him - the worse thing was lack of communication with people his own age! But it created such a strong bond between him and his sons.
Onto your writing, as I said, I thought this was very well-written and well structured. The idea of letters give it a natural form, and makes it stand out far more than if you had just written this in the conventional format. I thought your use of grammar was good, strong sentence construction, no nit-picks with your writing ability. (I haven't read your profile yet, but do you have journalism experience? Seems that way as you craft your words very well).
Here's some specific comments:
I would like to see more anecdotal incidents. For me, the family outing worked really well because it zoomed in on one specific day and related events in an immediate fashion (rather than general thoughts re fatherhood and brushing over the moment). Writing in the immediate slows the pace and, I think, catches the eye more. This is especially true when you use dialogue within the narrative too. So I would actually like to see more of this kind of anecdotal specific moment to create more immediacy within your writing. (i.e., in the scary Karen scene you could use some dialogue etc and really sink into the scene as if it were happening now.)
This type of device helps play with the pace and rhythm.
My next and final note is I would like to know more on the recipient of the letters. Who is this Dave? How does Ed get to write to him?
That's it. Overall, good writing, intelligent, thoughtful and with a light touch. You get my temporary shelf space too.
Hannah

Philip Gilliver wrote 649 days ago

Hi Edmund. This is fascinating reading. I was a househusband for many years and sympathise with the Ed in your story. I love the idea of writing it in letter/email form. Somehow it brings you into people's lives in a more direct way. A good, enjoyable read and I'll be back to read some more.

Take care!


Phil

Siobhán wrote 650 days ago

Hi Edmund,
You may have seen my thread last weekend about taking my book down and clearing my shelf etc.
In any case, I realised I won't have time to read the books that were already on my watchlist so, I've decided to shelve them in turn - I put them on my watchlist for a reason after all.

So, putting yours on my shelf today.

Best of luck here.
Siobhán

Mockingbird wrote 652 days ago

Even on a third or fourth reading this is totally priceless........ my stomach muscles are still getting a good laugh work out..... I have avoided taking coffee at the same time, beverages snorted over my ageing laptop won't do it much good.........

Edmund Farrow wrote 652 days ago

Edmund,

I love this idea. You have a quirky voice and some really good observations. I have nothing to comment on the writing. I think, though, but I stress it's only my opinion, that I'd like to see some structure in this book. After the introduction of David, could you perhaps make the whole thing chronological? Or sort the messages by subject, so there are little mini-stories that we can follow? There's a bit of this going on, but I'd like to see a better flow from one message to the next. As is, this reads like a series of newspaper columns, nice to read in short bursts, but harder to read in one sitting.



Thanks for the feedback, Patty. The book is intended more for reading in smaller bursts than in big binges. The events *are* chronological and a number of plot threads develop. It's possible that these need to be brought in earlier, though. Cheers.

Patty wrote 653 days ago

Edmund,

I love this idea. You have a quirky voice and some really good observations. I have nothing to comment on the writing. I think, though, but I stress it's only my opinion, that I'd like to see some structure in this book. After the introduction of David, could you perhaps make the whole thing chronological? Or sort the messages by subject, so there are little mini-stories that we can follow? There's a bit of this going on, but I'd like to see a better flow from one message to the next. As is, this reads like a series of newspaper columns, nice to read in short bursts, but harder to read in one sitting.

RoseRed wrote 654 days ago

Ed

You're up on my shelf with your delightful kids and useless dads! Good luck

Frankie

RoseRed wrote 655 days ago

Ed

Saw you recommended & hopped over for a quick look - this is very clever and very funny. Nice to see it from a bloke's perspective and you even make it sound like fun! I was a painter until I had a crop of kids, so know how hard it is to fit anything into a day other than childcare . like your short, snappy way of writing,and you've got some good lines - have watchlisted for now, but have a feeling will shelf this when I have read some more! Only suggestion I have is to lose the underlining - you only need inverted commas for names of films, etc. Will return with comments -

Frankie

PaddyClaretmen wrote 655 days ago

Hi Ed. How weird is that about us having the same character names etc? Seeing as your name is Ed I guess you didn't have much choice about that one!

Anyway, this is very good. I think you did absolutely the right thing in keeping all the letters from Ed's perspective and creating a character with Dave only through Ed's reactions. I'm guessing a lot of dads will relate to this (having no kids myself). It's a slight concern that the letter format may not hold out for an entire novel, so I would suggest including a hook or two in the form a recurring theme which runs through the whole thing. Ed needs a problem, and that problem needs to be tackled and (possibly) resolved as the novel goes on if it is to sustain a narrative. This will act as a spine to the novel and help to keep reader interest up. You may have done this anyway as I've only read the first chapter so far, so this is only a suggestion. Good luck with it and I'm giving you a spot on the bookshelf.

Nix wrote 655 days ago

Hello Edmund,
As promised, I'm back to read P and P. My, this is hilarious! I had a horrible feeling it was going to be Woman's Weekly trite stuff, but no! This is really well written, original and so witty my face was aching from grinning. (Been there, done that...) There are so many great one-liners, and I had such a clear picture of life as a housedad. Your narrative voice is excellent and the character just shines through.

This book is a real find and flies up on to my shelf. I shall plug it in the forum, and I hope my shelving rockets it way past that pathetic 154 position.

Would appreciate a glance at C&C if you have the time. I can certainly learn from your ability to communicate humour.

Nicky
(Chickens and Churchbells)

Richard P-S wrote 655 days ago

Dear Ed, having been a housedad myself, all this rings true. And it is screamingly hilarious, specially when supermum and supergran get their come-uppance. The only thing that grated was the same sign-off line "in a woman's worl". I think this would grate less if the narrative was actually formatted as emails, and the woman's world bit appeared as a standard email sig.

Other than that, like all books, it needs an edit, but it's definitely worth a rotating bookshelf. Good luck with this. R

Nix wrote 656 days ago

Heard some great things about P and P! Have watchlisted it and will read and comment this weekend.
Nicky
(Chickens and Churchbells)

Edmund Farrow wrote 657 days ago

I've just read your first chapter and I really enjoyed it. I'm looking forward to see how this book develops and will hopefully give more constructive feedback later!

Chriss.



Cheers, Chriss. Enjoy the rest!

Edmund Farrow wrote 660 days ago

Hi JAK and AJK! Thanks for the comments and bookshelvings, both of you. Glad you like the book.

AJK - Just the thought of having another child when my youngest is 9 makes me break out in a cold sweat. All the best to you!

JAK - I'm not sure exactly 'everyone' is raving about my book yet. (I get the impression Mockingbird might quite like it, though. ;-) ) I'll look at adding more responses to Dave on my next draft and see if he's a little too much of a silent partner on occasion. Cheers for the feedback.

AJK wrote 661 days ago

Hi Edward. Wonderful! I have 3 children my youngest 5,middle 14 and eldest 15. So toddlers and teens. (good title!) You picked up on some truly classic bits there. Funny,well written and so spot on. I can imagine every wife buying this for the hubbie!! onto my shelf!!

JAK wrote 661 days ago

Hi Edmund,
So this is the book which everyone's raving about? I'll tell you something- they're right. This is really special - clever, witty and essentially humane. You've got a lovely balance of realism, wry commentary on the strangeness of parenthooh and what is most endearing is the obvious depths of love your narrator has for his children. Great stuff.
I'll admit that the epistolary structure had me worried for a page or two- i thought it would be impossible to sustain- but I was wrong. It worked very well. i'm glad you didn't go for the full correspondence with the replies. The only suggestion I'd make on this is that you include some oblique references to supposed questions -'no, a chisel didn't work on the dried weetabix for me either- have you tried a rotary sander? ' that kind of thing - except yours would be much less glib.
Your language use is great- so far my favourite phrases are 'my screensaver face kicks in' and force them to have an exciting trip somewhere wet and cold'

This is an absolute delight of a book which I can imagine serialised on Radio 4. There is no higher praise.

This gets the en-suite guest slot on my bookshelf!

AJK wrote 663 days ago

WL as said. Your blog is great by the way!

Edmund Farrow wrote 663 days ago

Cheers, Saskia.

I'm not sure how I'd have reacted if I'd read PlayStations and Pooh before embarking on my housedad career. I'd probably have just laughed and thought, "I bet it's not like that really."

More fool me...

Enjoy the rest!

Saskia wrote 663 days ago

Dear Ed,
My husband's big ambition in life is to become a housedad, unfortunately there are no children to father yet. But I will let him read this first. Let's see if he is still up for it then....
I had a great time reading the first few chapters and will continue this evening. The irony which you use is very catching. Thanks for putting your book on authonomy.com. I'll let you know when I have finished and hopefully bookshelved it.

Edmund Farrow wrote 663 days ago

Glad you like it, Ursula. Many thanks for the encouragement and praise. All the best.

Ursula wrote 664 days ago

This is brilliantly, brilliantly funny and wonderful. Your humour is wry and the whole this is told in that just off deadpan way that works so well. I've been laughing at it for the last hour and there are so many people I can think of who would enjoy it. It thoroughly deserves the place on my shelf it's about to get and I hope it does really well.

Mockingbird wrote 664 days ago

Edmund, thank you for your kind words. The bookshop is real (or rather it was.....now sadly defunct) it had a life of its own, and the staff were all distinctly strange individuals...... There is a bomb later on in the book, although of WWII variety....one of theirs not one of ours...... and it doesn't go off.....but it does, in its own way, cause mayhem.

12