Book Jacket

 

rank 2406
word count 23639
date submitted 31.10.2008
date updated 25.01.2012
genres: Fiction, Chick Lit, Instructional, ...
classification: moderate
incomplete

PlayStations and Pooh

Edmund Farrow

One housedad's struggle to remain chirpy in a world full of sleep-deprived women and toddlers with toilet issues.

 

Meet Ed. Everyone always thinks Ed has the day off. Why else would he be out and about with three small children? But Ed has a wife with a paying job and a belief that parents should screw up their own kids rather than leaving it to strangers. Most importantly, he also has a pen-pal...

'PlayStations and Pooh' is written as a series of emails sent by a veteran housedad to encourage another housedad who is much nearer the start of his career. Unlike most depictions of housedads, Ed is happy and competent rather than repressed and hopeless. He just has a tendency to find himself in awkward situations surrounded by crazy people. Through dealing with these disasters, he passes on his knowledge of how to survive as a stay-at-home parent.

As he describes it, 'The hours are long, the holidays are rubbish, the pay's a joke and there's heavy exposure to toxic biological waste. On the plus side, there's plenty of fresh air and exercise, a steady supply of hugs, relatively little stress, strong job satisfaction and an army of amusing minions. You also get to play 'Hungry Hippos' and call it work.'

 
rate the book

to rate this book please Register or Login

 

tags

blokes, children, computer games, corporate madness, dads, family, gadgets, housedad, humour, parenthacks, parenting, survival, zombies

on 10 watchlists

65 comments

 

Text Size

Text Colour

Chapters

1

report abuse

Message in a bottle

Dear Dave,

I hope this letter finds you well. Actually, I just hope this letter finds you. 'Dave, The-dad-who-stays-at-home, Leeds' doesn't give the postie much to go on. Still, it's worth a shot. I'm guessing you're in Leeds because everyone I know in the entire country has heard of you, so you must live somewhere fairly central. As for your name, well, everyone I ever meet is called Dave and so it's a fair bet. Then again, the fact that I haven't met you might throw the statistics and I… Oh, never mind, I'm wittering on like a man who was up half the night being vomited on by a two-year-old.

Which brings me to my point.

Seeing as we've never met, maybe I'd better explain who I am. I'm the other one. Yes, the other housedad! I thought we should get a bit of a correspondence going to share our experiences because it's a mum's world we live in and no one really seems to understand. For instance, whenever I explain that I'm a housedad, people look confused and then remember that, in this politically correct age, every individual has an equal right to an outlandish and deviant lifestyle. They stop looking confused, they laugh nervously and then they affirm me. They tell me that housedads are quite common these days. After all, their mother's hairdresser's acquaintance's nephew stays home and looks after his children.

I smile and nod. "Yes, we're all over the place," I say. Then I go home and phone my aunt and tell her to stop gossiping to random hairdressers about me and the kids.

Of course, it's not always me they're talking about - sometimes they're talking about you – but I'm pretty sure there are only the two of us. We need to stick together. I'm fed up of just discussing babies at parent and toddler group. I want more. I want to share some meaningful insights on fatherhood, football and Buffy the Vampire Slayer. At the very least, I want to discuss PlayStations as well as poo (or, indeed, Pooh).

Please write back if you are able. If you're too busy searching the house for wooden bricks in an assortment of colours, then I quite understand. We have a tub that claims it contained a hundred when we bought it. At the last count there were twenty-three and the others aren't in the washing-machine. Where do they go?

Yours in a woman's world,

Ed.


 
The revolution begins

Hi Dave!

Thanks for your email address and the very positive reply to my letter. The revolution has begun. Housedads of the world unite! Let's make people realise that men can look after children too. The time has come for us to march on Downing Street and make our demands for a more equal society:

1. Derogatory comments which assume any man in sole charge of a child is a Sunday parent are to be banned. No old lady who walks straight into a male-driven pushchair, causing a pile-up, shall be allowed to get away with saying, 'Looks like you need a bit of practice, dear.

2. 'Baby facilities accessible to dads in public places will smell as nice as the ones available for mums. (And we want the comfy chairs too. We know they're in there).

3. Mums are to be forbidden from looking at us sideways when they learn that some misguided career woman has left us caring for her offspring all day.

4. We want higher prams.

5. We want bigger biscuits. (Not that mums already have bigger biscuits but it's worth having something to bargain away and, you never know, we might be able to slip it through.)

6. We want lower…

Oh, who am I kidding? There are only the two of us. We'd have difficulty causing a stir outside Number 10 even if we were wearing balaclavas and speaking with Middle Eastern accents. Besides, we'd have the kids with us. Everyone would merely assume we'd been sent to the shops to pick up a pack of nappies while our wives took a breather.

Maybe we could put the kids in balaclavas…

No, better leave them out of this and struggle on.

I always think that being a housedad must be somewhat like being a female car mechanic. Members of the opposite sex simply don't take you seriously. For goodness sake, it's as if they think we don't know a baby's backside from its elbow and that's the first lesson you learn, believe me… For the full effect, it's best to strap a baby to your front using one of those carriers and then go to the shops. If the baby is facing outwards, then every female you meet will spend the entire time talking to your chest. It's a salutary experience. Maybe we're not the only ones with demands to make. Maybe we should let female car mechanics into the group.

Maybe I should clear that with my wife first…

Ho well, I'll be in contact again soon. I'll leave you with my top tips for telling a baby's backside from his or her elbow:

- If it smells bad then it's probably the backside. No guarantees, though. Where's the baby been? When was the baby last washed?

- If it's in a nappy then, once again, it's probably the backside. Still no guarantees – you may have got it wrong last time.

- If it's sharp and in your eye then it's the elbow every time. Unless it's a knee. Or the TV remote. Or a brick. Or…

Yours in a woman's world,

Ed.


 
Parent and toddler

Dear Dave,

Thank you for telling me about your experiences with little Sam at the parent and toddler group. It sounds like you're blending in well. (Or at least as well as any man can in a room full of women who don't believe he can really exist. You'll know you've cracked it when someone asks you what your husband does for a living.) I have to tell you, however, that the competitiveness you mention is unavoidable. The desire to come out on top always surfaces whenever any group of children is involved.

Forget the kids themselves - the parents are bound to succumb.

It starts innocently enough as Parent A checks that her kid is normal – that it's not too odd for a child to only have had four teeth at a year, or to still be crawling at fifteen months. Parent B reassures. Her child only had six teeth at a year and only learnt to walk at fourteen months. Parent A isn't reassured. Six teeth is more than four. How about speech? Can Child B say 'tractor'? Ha, no! That's a point back to Parent A. Parent B retaliates. How many blocks can Child A stack? Only twelve? Really? He hasn't built a scale model of St Paul's, complete with dome? Well, I'm sure he'll learn. 3-1 to Parent B.

Then it escalates.

Before long, there are unconfirmed reports of advanced calculus and fluency in five distinct and unrelated languages. Meanwhile, the kids happily sit oblivious, chewing on brightly coloured bits of plastic.

It's very strange. Still, Marie came out on top today. At playgroup she demonstrated her innate understanding of the world's socio-economic system and put the knowledge into practice. She took the brightly coloured bits of plastic from the other children, chewed on them herself and then gave them to the nearest adult. In essence, she took from the little people, gave to the big people and had her own small nibble on the way. There's a bright future ahead of her in the City. That or a beating by a mob of angry toddlers.

Never mind, at least she'll probably grow out of it. When she's eighteen, the chances are that she'll have tie-dye clothes, peace symbols painted on her cheeks and a Communist boyfriend. They'll go off to India together to hug trees. Nonetheless, I'll still be playing the Progeny Edition of Top Trumps with the neighbours. ('You call your kid a dropout? How many Highers did he fail? Ha! And I bet his girlfriend's only a Socialist…')

As I said, the competitiveness is unavoidable. If you think you're not doing it, that simply means you're winning. The important thing is to love the kid even if you're losing.

Oh and by the way, I'm glad to hear that Sam's differentiation is coming along nicely but I have to tell you that my girl can already integrate trig functions.

And she can speak Swahili.

Yours, as ever, in a woman's world,

Ed.


 
Life after children

Dear Dave,

You're right - I have been getting a little ahead of myself in my correspondence so far. I should probably tell you some more about myself and my family.

My name is Ed, I'm thirty-three, I live in Edinburgh and I'm a housedad. I used to be a computer programmer in a Large Banking Organisation. I met my wife, Sarah, at LBO. She works in marketing. At the point our eldest son, Fraser, was born, I gave up lounging around surfing the internet and drinking coffee all day in order to put in some hard graft looking after him. He's now six. We also have Lewis who's four and Marie who's not long turned two. Most mornings these days, I'm lucky to have an opportunity to check my email, let alone stir up a flamewar on a Star Trek fansite just for fun. As for coffee, I'm like that kid in Signs, except I have dozens of half-full mugs of tepid Cafédirect lying forgotten round the place rather than glasses of water.

We get by. Sarah is happy with her job most of the time and does well for us. Her boss at LBO is a bit of an idiot who tends to favour those members of the team who go golfing with him (i.e. the men) but, hopefully, he'll do something really stupid soon and get banished to the Swedish office. Fraser's enjoying school, Lewis starts in August and Marie might get a place at nursery in the autumn. (Six months to go!)

People have already begun asking me what I plan to do in my spare time once I've got all three children out of the house. The obvious answer is that I'm going to eat my breakfast in peace while catching up on the headlines on BBCi and then follow that with a spot of cleaning, a chocolate biscuit and an actually hot cup of coffee. Unfortunately, most of my interrogators find it mildly disappointing that I don't have a scheme for world domination ready to put into action during my two hours a day... on weekdays... during term-time... when all the kids are well.

Perhaps they're right. Am I setting my aim too low? Maybe I can achieve more than sorting out the wilderness beyond the backdoor or filing the bank statements from the year before last. After all, I no longer have cleaning the windows left to look forward to. (Sarah found stuff growing on the inside of one of them the other day so I had to bring the maintenance schedule forward. They're good until the end of the decade now.) Let's see... What are the possibilities?

 

- I could put some more work into the script of Housedad! - The Musical. It's a classic tale of one man's struggle to be accepted into the local Women's Institute, featuring nuns on rollerskates, performing dolphins, a dream sequence involving Princess Leia in a gold bikini and the music of S Club 7. I see it as a semi-autobiographical work with myself played by H from Steps.

- I could learn a new skill. From taxidermy to Kung Fu, there are a wealth of possibilities out there. I'm sure every single one of them has some kind of practical application for childcare as well.

- Get a job. There must be something available that runs for a couple of hours on a weekday morning. It probably involves being underpaid, overworked and getting filthy, though. I've had enough of that already.

- I could help out at the nursery. (See above.)

- Crime. Flexible hours, performance related bonuses and low entry requirements. My preference would be for some form of pyramid selling fraud or chain-letter scam. I could send out letters with six names on (mine and five aliases). The recipients would have to send everyone on the list three shares in Nintendo, take the top name off, add their name at the bottom and pass it on. If I ever needed to hide evidence, I'd quickly give it to one of the kids, tell them it was really important and wait approximately a minute for it to mysteriously vanish. I'd have little chance of being caught and I'd own Mario. Excellent.

Or maybe I'll just have a rest. I'll be owed seven and a half years of lunch hours by then - that's an awful lot of Phil and Fern...

Yours in a woman's world,

Ed.


 
Another child

Dear Dave,

Congratulations! It's great to hear Sam has a little brother or sister on the way. I'm glad the scan went fine and Liz is doing OK. With luck, she'll stop being sick at the mention of broccoli soon.

In your email it sounds like you're somewhere on the border between Excitement and Panic. This is, of course, a fantastic locale to visit, full of unexpected career changes, lifestyle choices and sky-diving taster sessions, but you wouldn't want to live there. Take a deep breath. Resist the siren call of olive farming in Tuscany, of difficult to explain Visa bills and of mysterious women named Svetlana. Come home to the land in which every housedad should start his day - the land of Hopeful Trepidation. You may end the day in Rage or Despair but it's more likely that things will simply muddle along in the eventual direction of A Beer On The Sofa In Front Of CSI. (Don't confuse Hopeful Trepidation with Blind Optimism, however - always travel with a pack of babywipes, a change of socks, three spare nappies and a big stick.)

Which is merely another way of saying don't worry, you'll cope. Trust me. I've got three under-sevens and I'm still sane... OK, I admit I'm recovering from depression and I've just described your emotional state in the style of a housedad version of Pilgrim's Progress but I'm not yet entirely crazy and I still have my health. Apart from the bad back from lifting Fraser, this flu Marie gave me and a touch of conjunctivitis I picked up from Lewis...

Hmm... I'll come in again.

Two children? You'll be fine. I've got three but I'm still clinging to the last vestiges of reason and I'm not dead yet. No worries.

Perhaps this isn't as reassuring as I'd hoped. The truth is, you are going to have your hands full for a while. I used to know a guy who had five kids under nine years old. He was a somewhat busy man but he and his wife sailed around quite serenely in a sea of children. He told me that one child changes your life, a second child changes your life again and, beyond that, there's not much more left to change.

He was probably right. Looking after a baby takes plenty of time. When Fraser was small, I calculated that taking care of him took eight hours a day, nine days a week. It wasn't necessarily hard or constant labour, though. I could sit in an armchair and watch re-runs of ER while giving him a bottle, and then get on with other stuff while he had a nap. Lewis made things busier. There was always an awake child to be entertained and I was doing eleven days a week. That may not sound like a vast increase in workload but think of it more in terms of the drastic decrease in time left for anything else, including looking after another child. When Marie arrived, she simply had to fit in.

So, yes, your life is about to change again but not as much as last time and you're on a roll now - you might as well keep going. Nonetheless, having another child always seems daunting. You look at a dad with two children and wonder how he copes. He looks at me and my three in bewilderment. I look at a mum with four kids and break into manic giggling while my eye starts to twitch. She smiles sweetly and sails off serenely in her little sea of children. Bah...

Don't be discouraged. She doesn't have superhuman powers or an extraordinary level of patience. She's smiling because she's going to be home in fifteen minutes and then she'll be able to lock the little blighters back in their cage, put her feet up and watch Richard & Judy.

You see, children expand to fill the time you have available for them. If you've only got five minutes, they'll settle for that but, if you've got all day, then they'll take it. One of the most immediate advantages to having multiple children is you quickly learn that a crying child doesn't explode if you leave him for more than ten seconds. Trying to play Snakes and Ladders with one, while you change another and feed a third is clearly going to end in some form of misfortune. They have to wait their turn, no matter how much they whine. The more children you have, the more time you will spend ignoring most of them. Once you're good at it, you can spend some of the time ignoring all of them and sneak off for a cup of coffee and a quick surf.

Got to look forward to something... (Don't worry, you'll cope.)

Yours in a woman's world,

Ed.

P.S. Wish me luck on Monday - Scary Karen is after me.


 
Scary Karen

Dear Dave,

Did I tell you about Scary Karen?

We met when I inadvertently sat down next to her during biscuit time at parent and toddler recently. She was older than most of the other mums, big and looked serious. She started a conversation by introducing her toddler. "This is my son, Malcolm. He's named after my dead brother." She followed this up by introducing her baby. "This is William. He's named after my uncle. He's dead now, too." She then proceeded to breast-feed the baby.

Now I'm used to being around breast-feeding mothers. Some are so subtle that I've been talking to them for five minutes before I realise there's a baby up their jumper. The vast majority use a certain level of discretion or at least give me enough warning to look away while their human limpet gets properly attached. Not many wap out an enormous quivering boob right in front of me while continuing to fill me in on the details of their deceased relatives. I just about choked on my chocolate digestive. It was scary.

Most people would probably have smiled politely, gulped down their coffee and then whisked their bemused child off for an unexpected nappy change. I, however, have the unfortunate character flaw of being a 'good listener'. If someone starts talking to me, then I'll sit there in rapt attention, like a toddler mesmerised by a row of flashing lights. I'll nod and smile and occasionally interject but I'll be unable to move as my brain is slowly filled to bursting point by knowledge of what everyone in someone else's family had to eat for lunch in a museum of miniature teapots on a daytrip to Dumfries. Even better, as they consider exactly how many little jars of jam were consumed, my screensaver face kicks in and I'm really in trouble.

When my brain explodes from sheer tedium, it would be nice if I developed a blank gape and a vacant stare. Maybe then I'd get left alone. Instead, my facial muscles slump idly into an expression of sage-like thought and concentration. This makes it look like I'm listening even harder. I get to hear all about the teapots and an exhibition of replica steam engines whittled out of railway sleepers from around the world.

So I sat there and quickly discovered that Scary Karen is a 'good talker'. There was no escape. I learnt about her bowel surgery, aromatherapy, her difficult experiences in childbirth, a past life as a torturer and the importance of dental hygiene. She only stopped when the helpers started turning out the lights. Marie had already climbed into her buggy and was straining forwards while holding onto the frame in a doomed effort to drag herself home. We left at speed but I kept looking over my shoulder to check Karen wasn't following us.

The next week was similar, except she hunted me out and sat next to me. Then it was wap, choke, chat all over again. I nodded attentively as I was informed about the wonders of homemade cottage cheese, the variable consistency of cat vomit and the dangers of naked yoga on a bus. As soon as everything went dark, I grabbed the buggy and ran, screams of "You don't push! I pull me!" trailing behind us down the street.

Things have not improved much since. I've considered changing toddler groups but I know lots of the people at St Jude's, it's close, the chairs are comfy and there's nothing much else on a Monday anyway. I've been trying to disagree more audibly with everything Karen says but she doesn't appear to have noticed. Worse still, she's starting another group on a Wednesday morning in the Millennium Centre which is virtually across the road from my house. She's got the hall booked for tomorrow and has invited along a few people she met doing community service. And, you've guessed it, she wants me to be one of the group's founder members.

Another of my character flaws is that I'm not great with conflict. I much prefer to give someone a valid excuse for not doing something than simply inform them  I'd rather eat my only pair of shoes.

I told Karen that I need Wednesday mornings to do my grocery shopping. She suggested using the internet and getting a delivery. I reckoned it was easier going to the store myself. She gave me a computing tutorial. I said that I didn't really trust some random assistant in Tesco to choose my bananas. She told me she worked as an assistant in Tesco. I... I caved in. I said I'll go.

It's going to be me, Marie, Scary Karen, a select band of her scary friends and a gaggle of their no doubt scary children.

I'm a little nervous.

Yours in a woman's world,

Ed.

Chapters

1

report abuse

To leave comments on this or any book please Register or Login

subscribe to comments for this book
T Kirby-Jones wrote 1083 days ago

I was not supposed to read an entire book today. I was really meant to be doing other things. I have not done any other things.

This is one of the most amusing books on this site. So well written, so engaging, and apparently a sufficiently compulsive page turner that I have lost half a day’s work

Some favourites of mine:

In this politically correct age, every individual has an equal right to an outlandish and deviant lifestyle. Ha ha ha.

Don’t confuse Hopeful Trepidation with Blind Optimism, however – always travel with a pack of babywipes, a change of socks, three spare nappies and a big stick.

Children as pokemon – brilliant.

TKJ – How To Kill Your Housemates

bluestocking wrote 1170 days ago

Laughing my fool head off. How did I miss this for so long!!? I am racing to put this on my shelf really fast and coming back for more. You are an amazing comic genius. Your copy is impeccable. There is not a syllable to be altered (ok I am only through Ch. 1 and will be back if and when I run across anything.) And it's an epistolary novel! My favorite! Maybe it can be serialized, and hordes of people here in the U.S. will be waiting at port cities for the next installment, like with Dickens! I feel sure of it. Thank you, thank you.

Mockingbird wrote 1176 days ago

Even on a third or fourth reading this is totally priceless........ my stomach muscles are still getting a good laugh work out..... I have avoided taking coffee at the same time, beverages snorted over my ageing laptop won't do it much good.........

Nix wrote 1179 days ago

Hello Edmund,
As promised, I'm back to read P and P. My, this is hilarious! I had a horrible feeling it was going to be Woman's Weekly trite stuff, but no! This is really well written, original and so witty my face was aching from grinning. (Been there, done that...) There are so many great one-liners, and I had such a clear picture of life as a housedad. Your narrative voice is excellent and the character just shines through.

This book is a real find and flies up on to my shelf. I shall plug it in the forum, and I hope my shelving rockets it way past that pathetic 154 position.

Would appreciate a glance at C&C if you have the time. I can certainly learn from your ability to communicate humour.

Nicky
(Chickens and Churchbells)

AJK wrote 1185 days ago

Hi Edward. Wonderful! I have 3 children my youngest 5,middle 14 and eldest 15. So toddlers and teens. (good title!) You picked up on some truly classic bits there. Funny,well written and so spot on. I can imagine every wife buying this for the hubbie!! onto my shelf!!

Millie J wrote 14 days ago

Hi Ed, have just stumbled onto this and really laughed! As a parent to little kids, it struck many chords, and am sure it'd strike even more with my husband. Lots of luck, Millie x

JessRo wrote 731 days ago

Had me laughing all the way through and I didn't want to stop reading! Really enjoyed it and could happily reread.

jammer wrote 794 days ago

Great title and pitch. Good writing style. I've enjoyed what I've read so far. Backed.

Anne Wright wrote 950 days ago

Just took the chance to read another email before logging off. Absolutely delighted to read of your time in St Andrews. Our last visit was to our daughter's graduation many years ago and it is a place very dear to our hearts. We stayed there several times during her time at the University but, from your account, quite a few changes have occurred since our last visit. Thank you for the memory! Regards, Anne
PS I'm delighted to see P & P still on the authonomy site!!

Anne Wright wrote 954 days ago

Hello Ed, Although you may appreciate my time on authonomy has to be briefer than it has been up to now, I just could not logout without taking a peep at another of your emails. As ever, I have been cheered up beyond words (any thought of the impending operation disperses whenever I enter your realm of a man in a woman's world.) Keep it up; I'll get to the end . . . eventually . . . and then, what will I do whenever I feel low??!! Regards, Anne

Anne Wright wrote 959 days ago

Hello Ed I have had to make a very difficult decision (cf my new profile entry) and to make me feel better have read another of your emails. What will I do when they are all gone??!! Thank you very much for your support and good luck with your writing. I still intend to take a look at your website when I can. Regards, Anne

Anne Wright wrote 964 days ago

Hello Ed, My book isn't doing so well, my eye operation gets closer, my spirits are somewhat low . . . so, what do I do? Give myself a good dose of Playstations and Pooh, that's what! Your description of "life with children" is so 'on the mark' and your sense of humour . . . or is it paranoia? . . . is fantastic; and getting better. What will I do to cheer myself up when I run out of your emails? Good luck! Regards, Anne

Anne Wright wrote 979 days ago

Hello Ed, I can't believe you have a red arrow again! Some people have no sense of humour . . . or realism! Regards, Anne

Anne Wright wrote 980 days ago

PS Sadly, The Apartment, has begun to fall for the first time since I resubmitted it!!

Anne Wright wrote 980 days ago

Hello Ed, I am delighted to see that Play Stations and Pooh is rising! It would be most gratifying if my reading and commenting on it had something to do with this. Regards, Anne

Anne Wright wrote 981 days ago

Hello Ed, I just can't leave authonomy without spending my last few minutes with your emails. Don't think I would sleep if I didn't get my nightly 'fix'! Must go, have been on the site for ages; my husband thinks I've deserted him!! Regards, Anne

Anne Wright wrote 982 days ago

Hello Ed, Have read more and continue to be enthralled. I just LOVED your email about the 'benefits' of CBBC and CBeebies! Could I be cheeky and add In the Night Garden to your United Nations world disaster support items? (I should say, however, that my husband thinks there is rather a large deal of covert sexuality portrayed in all the kissing and cuddling . . . better than biffing each other over the head, I say!!). I look forward to your next email! Regards, Anne

Anne Wright wrote 983 days ago

Hello Ed. Oh how I wish I had the whole day at my disposal to read all of your work in one go! I have only managed to find the time to read two more of your emails and am absolutely AMAZED that your work does not seem to be getting the plaudits it deserves. You are so easy to read, I can relate to everything you say . . . as I said, I have two of my own and two gorgeous but madly mysterious grandchildren . . . and find it difficult to imagine that more people have not climbed on your 'band-wagon!' It is a sad indictment of modern day living that writing of such intellect, enlightenment and insight into REAL life is not number one on the authonomy list. I can't wait until my next visit to your 'woman's world!' Good luck, regards, Anne

Anne Wright wrote 986 days ago

Dear Ed, I just love it!!! I've only read your first two letters but I can hardly type for laughing! As a mother of two, one girl and one boy, and a gran of two of the most lively, bright, boisterous and extremely lovable 4 and 2 year olds, I can immerse myself totally in your work to the detriment of all the domestic and family matters which cause me to have very little time to read my favourites on authonomy; I believe something will have to change there!!! You have captured admirably the feelings of a man in what was once always regarded as a woman's world. I can only presume that you are a wonderful Dad to some very lucky children! I honestly cannot believe that your work is not soaring to the skies. It just serves to prove how much the literary world and the reading public has dropped its standards in recent years. I can't wait to read more. Regards, Anne

Anne Wright wrote 991 days ago

Hello Edmund, I've just returned to authonomy.com following an absence of several weeks - I've just resubmitted one of my books, The Apartment, which I hope you might find time to dip into, although I have to warn you this is more likely to appeal to the female reader; having said that, perhaps a housedad might just enjoy bits of it! I am intrigued both by your title and precis. I don't have too much time to spend on the website but I have added your book to my watchlist and will look into it as soon as I am able. Good Luck, Anne (Wright)

Karen Bessey Pease wrote 1082 days ago

Ed, good morning!

This was great... you've captured parenthood-- dadhood-- perfectly and allowed others to glimpse the wonders of this grand experience. Your dry sense of humor shines through, and I'm sure your adventures and how you've coped with them will give many a mother a great sense of relief when she walks out the door.

Thank you, and all my best to you and your family. This MS will be an important part of your children's personal histories.

Yours,
Karen

T Kirby-Jones wrote 1083 days ago

I was not supposed to read an entire book today. I was really meant to be doing other things. I have not done any other things.

This is one of the most amusing books on this site. So well written, so engaging, and apparently a sufficiently compulsive page turner that I have lost half a day’s work

Some favourites of mine:

In this politically correct age, every individual has an equal right to an outlandish and deviant lifestyle. Ha ha ha.

Don’t confuse Hopeful Trepidation with Blind Optimism, however – always travel with a pack of babywipes, a change of socks, three spare nappies and a big stick.

Children as pokemon – brilliant.

TKJ – How To Kill Your Housemates

Clare Wiltshire wrote 1126 days ago

This is great - what a clever way to write a story. I like the way we are just reading Ed's e-mails and not Dave's! Also an interesting subject matter & a great title - which is what atttracted me!

Forget the WL - I am going to stick this straight on the shelf! Clare

Lesley Barker wrote 1145 days ago

This is really great!

JHorger wrote 1155 days ago

Ed--
Genius writing, even though it's on a frightening topic. I laugh, though I am sad and weary. As a father of a four-year old daughter here, I can concur that your work is saturated with the truth. Although I feel not a little like a wimp being worn out at the end of the day by one little headstrong hellion in a tutu. But you've hit on the point: children expand to fit the time you have. Non-parents don't get it, until...
Anyway, I'm backing your book at the end of the week. (Everyone gets 5 days on my shelf.) And hoping more readers flock your way, because P & P must have commercial appeal. Thanks for posting this!
--Jason

Yvonne wrote 1158 days ago

I love your humor in all of this... enjoyed the read, and I have backed your book.
Yvonne

Edmund Farrow wrote 1167 days ago

Hi Edmund,

I watchlisted Playstations and Pooh a while ago, but Bluestocking’s plug on the forums speeded up my arrival.

My first impression is this is a funny and astute book. You have a gift for observation, especially things like the screensaver coming down. I am also a ‘good listener’ and was right there with you! The letter format works well. Do we ever get to see any of the replies? I don’t think it necessary, just curious.

One thing to note. You use the phrase ‘sea of children’ twice, quite close together.

My major thought regarding this, is the very beginning. I wasn’t sure about his description of where he worked, and where the wife works. Felt like back story shoved in because it needed to be. I think you’d be far more effective putting this in an anecdote – I bumped into so-and-so from my old office. He gave me the low down on Scandinavian bound boss… etc. That way we, the reader, are more involved. The other thought I had was that do these letters have to start at the beginning of the penpal friendship? Would it perhaps not be more effective to have the friendship be more established? Just a thought that wouldn’t make huge changes (although it might – I haven’t read all the book) but might make the initial couple of letters flow a little better. I hope you don’t mind me coming along and making suggestions. I do like this, and think it’s got lots of potential. I’m putting this on my shelf.

Lisa



Hi, Lisa. Thanks for the feedback and the shelving. I appreciate it.

The book only contains Ed's letters, to keep things simple. The letter format has many advantages in terms of being able to give a personal narrative and to change subject quickly by moving onto another letter. One of the disadvantages is trying to pass on information to the reader without Ed treating Dave like an idiot. Starting at the beginning of the correspondence lets me do a quick introduction info dump after a few pages and then move on. Could it be more natural? Maybe - I'll have a look in my next edit. (*Shudders at the thought of YET ANOTHER edit*)

The 'sea of children' is repeat for effect. Whether it's a good effect is, of course, another question... (Will investigate.)

Thanks again.

All the best, Edmund.

bluestocking wrote 1167 days ago

Hey! I put up a forum post about this but I thought of a new title for your book this morning right when I woke up!!!!

It is:

Prams and the Man

Is that a little too weird or obscure? do people even get into GB Shaw these days? He is a favorite of mine (aside from his crazy politics) so I was well pleased with myself when I thought of this. Anyhoo.

Ginger wrote 1167 days ago

Hi Edmund,

I watchlisted Playstations and Pooh a while ago, but Bluestocking’s plug on the forums speeded up my arrival.

My first impression is this is a funny and astute book. You have a gift for observation, especially things like the screensaver coming down. I am also a ‘good listener’ and was right there with you! The letter format works well. Do we ever get to see any of the replies? I don’t think it necessary, just curious.

One thing to note. You use the phrase ‘sea of children’ twice, quite close together.

My major thought regarding this, is the very beginning. I wasn’t sure about his description of where he worked, and where the wife works. Felt like back story shoved in because it needed to be. I think you’d be far more effective putting this in an anecdote – I bumped into so-and-so from my old office. He gave me the low down on Scandinavian bound boss… etc. That way we, the reader, are more involved. The other thought I had was that do these letters have to start at the beginning of the penpal friendship? Would it perhaps not be more effective to have the friendship be more established? Just a thought that wouldn’t make huge changes (although it might – I haven’t read all the book) but might make the initial couple of letters flow a little better. I hope you don’t mind me coming along and making suggestions. I do like this, and think it’s got lots of potential. I’m putting this on my shelf.

Lisa

Edmund Farrow wrote 1169 days ago

Higher prams! Yes! And not just for dads. Why are all women assumed to be 5’3’’, just because most of them are? (Sorry, you brought it all back for a moment. What I refer to as my Zombie Years, when I was certifiable from sleep-deprivation.)

An easy, amusing read, written in a clear style that slips down easily. This surely would sell rather well?



Cheers, Lexi.

Your mention of your Zombie Years of children-induced sleep deprivation makes me think. It suddenly occurs to me that this is maybe why I'm always so concerned about the possibility of undead invasion. It's just flashbacks to parent and toddler and spending hours in a room full of parents with shuffling gaits, vacant expressions and a groaning desire for coffee!

As for PlayStations and Pooh selling well... I guess that's always the hope. Personally, I think there'd be a strong Father's Day/Christmas gift market. Plus I could probably drum up some publicity via various specialist mags (gaming, parenting and Christian) with the right spin.

My phone's not exactly ringing off the hook yet, though ;-)

All the best, Edmund.

Lexi wrote 1169 days ago

Higher prams! Yes! And not just for dads. Why are all women assumed to be 5’3’’, just because most of them are? (Sorry, you brought it all back for a moment. What I refer to as my Zombie Years, when I was certifiable from sleep-deprivation.)

Single fathers are even rarer than housedads, because women coo over them and rush in to help, then they are not single any more. They only last for about five minutes. But I digress.

‘Screensaver face’ – excellent. Karen… This is full of good bits. I also like the fact that it’s a man writing without moaning about how he hates his job, the people he works with, and he doesn’t get laid enough.

An easy, amusing read, written in a clear style that slips down easily. This surely would sell rather well?

bluestocking wrote 1170 days ago

The really amazing thing is that I'm still totally guffawing, chapter after chapter. I haven't laughed this hard at a book for ages. Anybody as hilarious as you are doesn't need to worry two pins about character development or any of that hoo-haw, because I or anybody else would buy this after reading one page of it in a bookshop. It's such light, giddy humor, it doesn't come with a side order of Meaning (don't get me wrong, I loves me my satire too, very much.) It is just so much fun. I love it love it love it.

bluestocking wrote 1170 days ago

Laughing my fool head off. How did I miss this for so long!!? I am racing to put this on my shelf really fast and coming back for more. You are an amazing comic genius. Your copy is impeccable. There is not a syllable to be altered (ok I am only through Ch. 1 and will be back if and when I run across anything.) And it's an epistolary novel! My favorite! Maybe it can be serialized, and hordes of people here in the U.S. will be waiting at port cities for the next installment, like with Dickens! I feel sure of it. Thank you, thank you.

Hannah wrote 1171 days ago

Hi Edmund
I thought i'd dip in first and take a read of this book of yours - which seems to be flying up the weekly charts!
I read the first 2 chapters and my immediate thought was how well written and constructed this was. And no wonder people are backing it! I have a friend of mine who is a house-husband of 2 young boys. I know it hasn't been easy for him - the worse thing was lack of communication with people his own age! But it created such a strong bond between him and his sons.
Onto your writing, as I said, I thought this was very well-written and well structured. The idea of letters give it a natural form, and makes it stand out far more than if you had just written this in the conventional format. I thought your use of grammar was good, strong sentence construction, no nit-picks with your writing ability. (I haven't read your profile yet, but do you have journalism experience? Seems that way as you craft your words very well).
Here's some specific comments:
I would like to see more anecdotal incidents. For me, the family outing worked really well because it zoomed in on one specific day and related events in an immediate fashion (rather than general thoughts re fatherhood and brushing over the moment). Writing in the immediate slows the pace and, I think, catches the eye more. This is especially true when you use dialogue within the narrative too. So I would actually like to see more of this kind of anecdotal specific moment to create more immediacy within your writing. (i.e., in the scary Karen scene you could use some dialogue etc and really sink into the scene as if it were happening now.)
This type of device helps play with the pace and rhythm.
My next and final note is I would like to know more on the recipient of the letters. Who is this Dave? How does Ed get to write to him?
That's it. Overall, good writing, intelligent, thoughtful and with a light touch. You get my temporary shelf space too.
Hannah

Philip Gilliver wrote 1173 days ago

Hi Edmund. This is fascinating reading. I was a househusband for many years and sympathise with the Ed in your story. I love the idea of writing it in letter/email form. Somehow it brings you into people's lives in a more direct way. A good, enjoyable read and I'll be back to read some more.

Take care!


Phil

Siobhán wrote 1174 days ago

Hi Edmund,
You may have seen my thread last weekend about taking my book down and clearing my shelf etc.
In any case, I realised I won't have time to read the books that were already on my watchlist so, I've decided to shelve them in turn - I put them on my watchlist for a reason after all.

So, putting yours on my shelf today.

Best of luck here.
Siobhán

Mockingbird wrote 1176 days ago

Even on a third or fourth reading this is totally priceless........ my stomach muscles are still getting a good laugh work out..... I have avoided taking coffee at the same time, beverages snorted over my ageing laptop won't do it much good.........

Edmund Farrow wrote 1177 days ago

Edmund,

I love this idea. You have a quirky voice and some really good observations. I have nothing to comment on the writing. I think, though, but I stress it's only my opinion, that I'd like to see some structure in this book. After the introduction of David, could you perhaps make the whole thing chronological? Or sort the messages by subject, so there are little mini-stories that we can follow? There's a bit of this going on, but I'd like to see a better flow from one message to the next. As is, this reads like a series of newspaper columns, nice to read in short bursts, but harder to read in one sitting.



Thanks for the feedback, Patty. The book is intended more for reading in smaller bursts than in big binges. The events *are* chronological and a number of plot threads develop. It's possible that these need to be brought in earlier, though. Cheers.

Patty wrote 1178 days ago

Edmund,

I love this idea. You have a quirky voice and some really good observations. I have nothing to comment on the writing. I think, though, but I stress it's only my opinion, that I'd like to see some structure in this book. After the introduction of David, could you perhaps make the whole thing chronological? Or sort the messages by subject, so there are little mini-stories that we can follow? There's a bit of this going on, but I'd like to see a better flow from one message to the next. As is, this reads like a series of newspaper columns, nice to read in short bursts, but harder to read in one sitting.

RoseRed wrote 1178 days ago

Ed

You're up on my shelf with your delightful kids and useless dads! Good luck

Frankie

RoseRed wrote 1179 days ago

Ed

Saw you recommended & hopped over for a quick look - this is very clever and very funny. Nice to see it from a bloke's perspective and you even make it sound like fun! I was a painter until I had a crop of kids, so know how hard it is to fit anything into a day other than childcare . like your short, snappy way of writing,and you've got some good lines - have watchlisted for now, but have a feeling will shelf this when I have read some more! Only suggestion I have is to lose the underlining - you only need inverted commas for names of films, etc. Will return with comments -

Frankie

PaddyClaretmen wrote 1179 days ago

Hi Ed. How weird is that about us having the same character names etc? Seeing as your name is Ed I guess you didn't have much choice about that one!

Anyway, this is very good. I think you did absolutely the right thing in keeping all the letters from Ed's perspective and creating a character with Dave only through Ed's reactions. I'm guessing a lot of dads will relate to this (having no kids myself). It's a slight concern that the letter format may not hold out for an entire novel, so I would suggest including a hook or two in the form a recurring theme which runs through the whole thing. Ed needs a problem, and that problem needs to be tackled and (possibly) resolved as the novel goes on if it is to sustain a narrative. This will act as a spine to the novel and help to keep reader interest up. You may have done this anyway as I've only read the first chapter so far, so this is only a suggestion. Good luck with it and I'm giving you a spot on the bookshelf.

Nix wrote 1179 days ago

Hello Edmund,
As promised, I'm back to read P and P. My, this is hilarious! I had a horrible feeling it was going to be Woman's Weekly trite stuff, but no! This is really well written, original and so witty my face was aching from grinning. (Been there, done that...) There are so many great one-liners, and I had such a clear picture of life as a housedad. Your narrative voice is excellent and the character just shines through.

This book is a real find and flies up on to my shelf. I shall plug it in the forum, and I hope my shelving rockets it way past that pathetic 154 position.

Would appreciate a glance at C&C if you have the time. I can certainly learn from your ability to communicate humour.

Nicky
(Chickens and Churchbells)

Richard P-S wrote 1180 days ago

Dear Ed, having been a housedad myself, all this rings true. And it is screamingly hilarious, specially when supermum and supergran get their come-uppance. The only thing that grated was the same sign-off line "in a woman's worl". I think this would grate less if the narrative was actually formatted as emails, and the woman's world bit appeared as a standard email sig.

Other than that, like all books, it needs an edit, but it's definitely worth a rotating bookshelf. Good luck with this. R

Nix wrote 1180 days ago

Heard some great things about P and P! Have watchlisted it and will read and comment this weekend.
Nicky
(Chickens and Churchbells)

Edmund Farrow wrote 1181 days ago

I've just read your first chapter and I really enjoyed it. I'm looking forward to see how this book develops and will hopefully give more constructive feedback later!

Chriss.



Cheers, Chriss. Enjoy the rest!

Edmund Farrow wrote 1185 days ago

Hi JAK and AJK! Thanks for the comments and bookshelvings, both of you. Glad you like the book.

AJK - Just the thought of having another child when my youngest is 9 makes me break out in a cold sweat. All the best to you!

JAK - I'm not sure exactly 'everyone' is raving about my book yet. (I get the impression Mockingbird might quite like it, though. ;-) ) I'll look at adding more responses to Dave on my next draft and see if he's a little too much of a silent partner on occasion. Cheers for the feedback.

AJK wrote 1185 days ago

Hi Edward. Wonderful! I have 3 children my youngest 5,middle 14 and eldest 15. So toddlers and teens. (good title!) You picked up on some truly classic bits there. Funny,well written and so spot on. I can imagine every wife buying this for the hubbie!! onto my shelf!!

JAK wrote 1185 days ago

Hi Edmund,
So this is the book which everyone's raving about? I'll tell you something- they're right. This is really special - clever, witty and essentially humane. You've got a lovely balance of realism, wry commentary on the strangeness of parenthooh and what is most endearing is the obvious depths of love your narrator has for his children. Great stuff.
I'll admit that the epistolary structure had me worried for a page or two- i thought it would be impossible to sustain- but I was wrong. It worked very well. i'm glad you didn't go for the full correspondence with the replies. The only suggestion I'd make on this is that you include some oblique references to supposed questions -'no, a chisel didn't work on the dried weetabix for me either- have you tried a rotary sander? ' that kind of thing - except yours would be much less glib.
Your language use is great- so far my favourite phrases are 'my screensaver face kicks in' and force them to have an exciting trip somewhere wet and cold'

This is an absolute delight of a book which I can imagine serialised on Radio 4. There is no higher praise.

This gets the en-suite guest slot on my bookshelf!

AJK wrote 1187 days ago

WL as said. Your blog is great by the way!

Edmund Farrow wrote 1187 days ago

Cheers, Saskia.

I'm not sure how I'd have reacted if I'd read PlayStations and Pooh before embarking on my housedad career. I'd probably have just laughed and thought, "I bet it's not like that really."

More fool me...

Enjoy the rest!

Saskia wrote 1187 days ago

Dear Ed,
My husband's big ambition in life is to become a housedad, unfortunately there are no children to father yet. But I will let him read this first. Let's see if he is still up for it then....
I had a great time reading the first few chapters and will continue this evening. The irony which you use is very catching. Thanks for putting your book on authonomy.com. I'll let you know when I have finished and hopefully bookshelved it.

Edmund Farrow wrote 1188 days ago

Glad you like it, Ursula. Many thanks for the encouragement and praise. All the best.

Ursula wrote 1188 days ago

This is brilliantly, brilliantly funny and wonderful. Your humour is wry and the whole this is told in that just off deadpan way that works so well. I've been laughing at it for the last hour and there are so many people I can think of who would enjoy it. It thoroughly deserves the place on my shelf it's about to get and I hope it does really well.

Mockingbird wrote 1188 days ago

Edmund, thank you for your kind words. The bookshop is real (or rather it was.....now sadly defunct) it had a life of its own, and the staff were all distinctly strange individuals...... There is a bomb later on in the book, although of WWII variety....one of theirs not one of ours...... and it doesn't go off.....but it does, in its own way, cause mayhem.

12